Nature exposure induces hypoalgesia by acting on nociception-related neural processing
Steininger, M. O.; White, M. P.; Lengersdorff, L.; Zhang, L.; Smalley, A. J.; Kuehn, S.; Lamm, C.
Show abstract
Nature exposure has numerous psychological benefits, and previous findings suggest that exposure to nature reduces self-reported acute pain. Given the multi-faceted and subjective quality of pain and methodological limitations of prior research, it is unclear whether the evidence indicates genuine hypoalgesia or results from domain-general effects and subjective reporting biases. This preregistered functional neuroimaging study aimed to identify how nature exposure modulates nociception-related and domain-general brain responses to acute pain. We compared the self-reported and neural responses of healthy neurotypical participants (N = 49) receiving painful electrical shocks while exposed to virtual nature or to closely matched urban and indoor control settings. Replicating existing behavioral evidence, pain was reported to be lower during exposure to the natural compared to the urban or indoor control settings. Crucially, machine-learning-based multi-voxel signatures of pain demonstrated that this subjective hypoalgesia was associated with reductions in nociception-related rather than domain-general cognitive-emotional neural pain processing. Preregistered region-of-interest analyses corroborated these results, highlighting reduced activation of areas connected to lower-level somatosensory aspects of pain processing (such as the thalamus, secondary somatosensory cortex, and posterior insula). These findings demonstrate that nature exposure results in genuine hypoalgesia and that neural changes in lower-level nociceptive pain processing predominantly underpin this effect. This advances our understanding of how nature may be used as a non-pharmacological pain treatment. That this hypoalgesia was achieved with brief and easy-to-administer virtual nature exposure has important practical implications and opens novel avenues for research on the precise mechanisms by which nature impacts our mind and brain.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Augmented Pain-Evoked Primary Sensorimotor Cortex Activation in Adolescent Girls with Juvenile Fibromyalgia 96%
- Assessing the predictive value of peak alpha frequency for the sensitivity to pain 96%
- Baseline Resting-State Functional Connectivity Determines Subsequent Pain Ratings to a Tonic Ecologically Valid Experimental Model of Orofacial Pain 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expectations and uncertainty shape pain perception during learning 95%
- Modulating Brain Rhythms of Pain using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)? A Sham-controlled Study in Healthy Human Participants 94%
- Effects of Savoring Meditation on Positive Emotions and Pain-Related Brain Function: A Mechanistic Randomized Controlled Trial in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Instructions and experiential learning have similar impacts on pain and pain-related brain responses but produce dissociations in value-based reversal learning 96%
- The neural dynamics of positive and negative expectations of pain 95%
- Cortico-spinal coupling along descending pain system differentiates between opioid and saline treatment in healthy participants 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perception 94%
- Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Neurons in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Differentially Influence Pain Processing and Modulation in Male and Female Mice 93%
- Neural mechanisms of costly helping in the general population and mirror-pain synesthetes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.