Back

NPmatch: Latent Batch Effects Correction of Omics data by Nearest-Pair Matching

Zito, A.; Martinelli, A.; Masiero, M.; Akhmedov, M.; Kwee, I.

2024-05-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.04.29.591524 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationBatch effects (BEs) are a predominant source of noise in omics data and often mask real biological signals. BEs remain common in existing datasets. Current methods for BE correction mostly rely on specific assumptions or complex models, and may not detect and adjust BEs adequately, impacting downstream analysis and discovery power. To address these challenges we developed NPmatch, a nearest-neighbor matching-based method that adjusts BEs satisfactorily and outperforms current methods in a wide range of datasets. ResultsWe assessed distinct metrics and graphical readouts, and compared our method to commonly used BE correction methods. NPmatch demonstrates overall superior performance in correcting for BEs while preserving biological differences than existing methods. Altogether, our method proves to be a valuable BE correction approach to maximize discovery in biomedical research, with applicability in clinical research where latent BEs are often dominant. Data availability and implementationNPmatch is freely available on Github (https://github.com/bigomics/NPmatch) and on Omics Playground (https://bigomics.ch/omics-playground). The datasets underlying this article are the following: GSE120099, GSE82177, GSE162760, GSE171343, GSE153380, GSE163214, GSE182440, GSE163857, GSE117970, GSE173078, GSE10846. All these datasets are publicly available and can be freely accessed on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.