The impact of removing a ban on electronic nicotine delivery systems using the Mexico smoking and vaping model (SAVM)
Sanchez-Romero, L. M.; Li, Y.; Zavala-Arciniega, L.; Gallegos-Carrillo, K.; Thrasher, J. F.; Meza, R.; Levy, D. T.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo develop the Mexico Smoking and Vaping Model (Mexico SAVM) to estimate cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) prevalence and the public health impact of legalizing ENDS use. MethodsSAVM, a cohort-based discrete-time simulation model, compares two scenarios. The ENDS-Restricted Scenario estimates smoking prevalence and associated mortality outcomes under the current policy of an ENDS ban, using Mexico-specific population projections, death rates, life expectancy, and smoking and e-cigarette prevalence. The ENDS-Unrestricted Scenario projects smoking and vaping prevalence under a hypothetical scenario where ENDS use is allowed. The impact of legalizing ENDS use is estimated as the difference in smoking- and vaping-attributable deaths (SVADs) and life-years lost (LYLs) between the ENDS-Restricted and Unrestricted scenarios. ResultsCompared to a national ENDS ban, The Mexico SAVM projects that legalizing ENDS use could decrease smoking prevalence by 40.1% in males and 30.9% in females by 2049 compared to continuing the national ENDS ban. This reduction in prevalence would save 2.9 (2.5 males and 0.4 females) million life-years and avert almost 106 (91.0 males and 15.5 females) thousand deaths between 2025 and 2049. Public health gains decline by 43% to 59,748 SVADs averted when the switching rate is reduced by half and by 24.3% (92,806 SVADs averted) with a 25% ENDS risk level from that of cigarettes but increased by 24.3% (121,375 SVADs averted) with the 5% ENDS risk. ConclusionsMexico SAVM suggests that greater access to ENDS and a more permissive ENDS regulation, simultaneous with strong cigarette policies, would reduce smoking prevalence and decrease smoking-related mortality. The unanticipated effects of an ENDS ban merit closer scrutiny, with further consideration of how specific ENDS restrictions may maximize public health benefits.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- State-level disparities in cervical cancer prevention and outcomes in the U.S.: A modeling study 91%
- Asian Lung Cancer Absolute Risk Models for lung cancer mortality based on China Kadoorie Biobank 90%
- Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- E-cigarette use and Respiratory Symptoms in Residents of the United States: A BRFSS Report 93%
- The effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes in smokers with mood or anxiety disorders: a double-blind randomized trial 92%
- Can alcohol consumption in Germany be reduced by alcohol screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in primary health care? Results of a simulation study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing Compliance with Smoke-Free Laws in Purbakhola Rural Municipality, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study 90%
- Intimate partner violence and its correlates in middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country secondary analysis 88%
- Changes in the prevalence of the common risk factors for non-communicable diseases in Uganda between 2014 and 2023: Informed by nationally representative cross-sectional surveys 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Youth susceptibility to tobacco use: Is it general or specific? 93%
- Improving on estimates of the relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking 92%
- How can we maximise the benefits of smoke-free prisons? Decision analytic model to predict potential impacts on public health 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.