Back

Large Language Models for Pathway Curation: A Preliminary Investigation

Karkera, N.; Karkera, N.; Kumar, M.; Ghosh, S.; Palaniappan, S. K.

2024-04-29 systems biology
10.1101/2024.04.26.591413 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The pathway curation task involves analyzing scientific literature to identify and represent cellular processes as pathways. This process, often time-consuming and labor-intensive, requires significant curation efforts amidst the rapidly growing biomedical literature. Natural Language Processing (NLP) offers a promising method to automatically extract these interactions from scientific texts. Despite immense progress, there remains room for improvement in these systems. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) provides a promising solution for this challenge. Our study conducts a preliminary investigation into leveraging LLMs for the pathway curation task. This paper first presents a review of the current state-of-the-art algorithms for the pathway curation task. Our objective is to check the feasibility and formulate strategies of using these LLMs to improve the accuracy of pathway curation task. Our experiments demonstrate that our GPT-3.5 based fine-tuned models outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, our model achieved a 10 basis point improvement in over-all recall and F1 score compared to the best existing algorithms. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs in pathway curation tasks, warranting further research and substantial efforts in this direction. Keypoints/ObjectivesO_LIStudy evaluates the feasibility of using Large Language Models (LLMs) for pathway curation in scientific literature. C_LIO_LIUsing GPT-3.5 based fine tuned models for pathway curation, we compare its performance with existing methods, focusing on precision, recall and F1 score metrics. C_LIO_LIEmphasize the promise and need for further research on using LLMs for pathway curation. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
26.2%
2
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
4
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
5
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
7
Frontiers in Systems Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
11
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
13
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
20
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
22
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%