Advancing cooperative breeding research with a peer-reviewed and "live" Cooperative-Breeding Database (Co-BreeD)
Ben Mocha, Y.; Woith, M.; Drobniak, S. M.; Markman, S.; Frisoni, F.; Baglione, V.; Boersma, J.; Cousseau, L.; Covas, R.; Braga de Miranda, G. H.; Dey, C. J.; Doutrelant, C.; Gula, R.; Heinsohn, R.; Kingma, S. A.; Li, J.; Middleton, K.-M.; Radford, A.; Restrepo, C.; Rubenstein, D. R.; Schradin, C.; Theuerkauf, J.; Warrington, M. H.; Williams, D. A.; Woxvold, I. A.; Griesser, M.
Show abstract
Research on cooperative breeding (a system with the core characteristic of individuals providing care for the offspring of others) is important for understanding sociality and cooperation. However, large-scale comparative analyses on the drivers and consequences of cooperation frequently use considerably inaccurate datasets (e.g. due to inconsistent definitions and outdated information). To advance comparative research on cooperative breeding, we introduce the Cooperative-Breeding Database (Co-BreeD), a growing database of key socio-biological parameters of birds and mammals. First, we describe Co-BreeDs structure as a (i) sample-based (i.e. multiple samples per species linked to an exact sampling location and period), (ii) peer-reviewed and (iii) updatable resource. Respectively, these curating principles allow for (i) investigating intra- and inter-species variation and linking between fine-scale social and environmental parameters, (ii) accuracy and (iii) continuous correction and expansion with the publication of new data. Second, we present the first Co-BreeD dataset, which estimates the prevalence of breeding events with potential alloparents in 265 samples from 233 populations of 150 species, including 2 human societies (N = 26,366 breeding events). We conclude by demonstrating (i) how Co-BreeD facilitates more accurate comparative research (e.g. increased explanatory power by enabling the study of cooperative breeding as a continuous trait, and statistically accounting for the sampling error probabilities), and (ii) that cooperative breeding in birds and mammals is more prevalent than currently estimated.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic relatedness cannot explain social preferences in black-and-white ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata). 94%
- Heterospecific song quality as social information for settlement decisions: an experimental approach in a wild bird 94%
- Bamboozling Interactions: Interspecific associations within mixed-species bird flocks in bamboo in the Eastern Himalaya 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating population genetics to define conservation units from the core to the edge of Rhinolophus ferrumequinum western range 94%
- Island syndrome in the critically endangered Lord Howe Island cockroach Panesthia lata 94%
- How do King Cobras move across a major highway? Unintentional wildlife crossing structures may facilitate movement. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Generation time and seasonal migration explain variation in spatial population synchrony across European bird species 94%
- To mate, or not to mate: The evolution of reproductive diapause facilitates insect radiation into African savannahs in the Late Miocene 94%
- Genetic, natal, and spatial drivers of social phenotypes in wild great tits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Natal philopatry, dispersal and age of first breeding in relation to size and sex of Arctic Terns Sterna paradisaea 94%
- Habitat partitioning and spatial segregation at multiple scales promotes year-round coexistence in a guild of forest songbirds 94%
- Fast and furious: host aggression modulates behaviour of brood parasites 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.