Back

Advancing cooperative breeding research with a peer-reviewed and "live" Cooperative-Breeding Database (Co-BreeD)

Ben Mocha, Y.; Woith, M.; Drobniak, S. M.; Markman, S.; Frisoni, F.; Baglione, V.; Boersma, J.; Cousseau, L.; Covas, R.; Braga de Miranda, G. H.; Dey, C. J.; Doutrelant, C.; Gula, R.; Heinsohn, R.; Kingma, S. A.; Li, J.; Middleton, K.-M.; Radford, A.; Restrepo, C.; Rubenstein, D. R.; Schradin, C.; Theuerkauf, J.; Warrington, M. H.; Williams, D. A.; Woxvold, I. A.; Griesser, M.

2024-04-29 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.04.26.591342 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Research on cooperative breeding (a system with the core characteristic of individuals providing care for the offspring of others) is important for understanding sociality and cooperation. However, large-scale comparative analyses on the drivers and consequences of cooperation frequently use considerably inaccurate datasets (e.g. due to inconsistent definitions and outdated information). To advance comparative research on cooperative breeding, we introduce the Cooperative-Breeding Database (Co-BreeD), a growing database of key socio-biological parameters of birds and mammals. First, we describe Co-BreeDs structure as a (i) sample-based (i.e. multiple samples per species linked to an exact sampling location and period), (ii) peer-reviewed and (iii) updatable resource. Respectively, these curating principles allow for (i) investigating intra- and inter-species variation and linking between fine-scale social and environmental parameters, (ii) accuracy and (iii) continuous correction and expansion with the publication of new data. Second, we present the first Co-BreeD dataset, which estimates the prevalence of breeding events with potential alloparents in 265 samples from 233 populations of 150 species, including 2 human societies (N = 26,366 breeding events). We conclude by demonstrating (i) how Co-BreeD facilitates more accurate comparative research (e.g. increased explanatory power by enabling the study of cooperative breeding as a continuous trait, and statistically accounting for the sampling error probabilities), and (ii) that cooperative breeding in birds and mammals is more prevalent than currently estimated.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.