Back

Long-sperm precedence and other cryptic female choices in Drosophila melanogaster

Peckenpaugh, B.; Yew, J. Y.; Moyle, L. C.

2024-09-14 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.04.25.591180 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Females that mate multiply make postmating choices about which sperm fertilize their eggs (cryptic female choice); however, the male characteristics they use to make such choices remain unclear. In this study, we sought to understand female sperm use patterns by evaluating whether Drosophila melanogaster females adjust sperm use (second male paternity) in response to four main factors: male genotype, male courtship effort, male pheromone alteration, and male postmating reproductive morphology. Our experiment was replicated across four different D. melanogaster lines, in a full factorial design, including a pheromone manipulation in which second males were perfumed to resemble heterospecific (D. yakuba) males. We found that females prefer longer sperm--regardless of mating order--in almost all contexts; this observed pattern of long-sperm precedence is consistent with female postmating choice of high-fitness male traits. Nonetheless, we also found that this general preference can be plastically altered by females in response to effects including perfuming treatment; this differential female sperm use is between otherwise identical males, and therefore solely female-mediated. Furthermore, our finding that females exercise choice using diverse criteria suggests a possible mechanism for the maintenance of variation in sexually selected male traits. Teaser textHow do females make choices about which sperm will fertilize their eggs? In this study, we assess four geographically diverse Drosophila melanogaster lines to show that females strongly prefer long sperm--a pattern consistent with female preference for high-fitness males. In addition, we perfumed males to show that females can adjust this general preference based on other factors, including pheromones. Because this adjustment occurs between genotypically identical males, it is entirely female-mediated.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.