Back

Evaluating the causal relationships between urate, blood pressure, and kidney function in the general population: a two-sample Mendelian Randomization study

TANG, H.; Walker, V. M.; Gaunt, T. R.

2024-04-26 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.04.25.24306305 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAssociations between blood urate levels, blood pressure (BP), and kidney function have previously been reported in observational studies. However, causal inference between these three traits is challenging due to potentially bidirectional relationships. Method: We applied bidirectional univariable Mendelian randomization (UVMR) to assess the causal relationships between urate levels, BP, and kidney function, proxied by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), using genetic associations from UK Biobank and CKDGen. We performed multivariable MR (MVMR) to assess the independent effects of urate and BP on eGFR. Effect estimates are presented as standard deviation (SD) change in outcome (95% confidence interval) per SD increase in exposure. ResultsThe UVMR analysis showed a bidirectional causal effect between urate and eGFR [urate on log(eGFR): beta=-0.10 (-0.22 to 0.02); log(eGFR) on urate: beta=-0.11 (-0.17 to -0.04)]. We also found bidirectional causal effects between urate and SBP [urate on SBP: beta=0.08 (0.04 to 0.11); SBP on urate: beta=0.13 (0.08 to 0.18)] and urate and DBP [urate on DBP: beta=0.09 (0.05 to 0.14); DBP on urate: beta=0.13 (0.08 to 0.18)]. However, there was weak evidence of a causal effect between BP and eGFR. MVMR results suggested the causal effect of urate on eGFR was independent of BP. ConclusionOur results provide evidence for bidirectional causal effects between urate and both eGFR and BP, suggesting urate control as a potential intervention to reduce BP and decline in kidney function in the general population, but little evidence of a causal relationship between BP and eGFR.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.