Back

How many colours can you see? Real environmental lighting increases discriminability of surface colours

Morimoto, T.; Linhares, J. M. M.; Nascimento, S. M. C.; Smithson, H. E.

2024-04-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.04.23.590719 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Color supports object identification. However, two objects that differ in color under one light can appear indiscriminable under a second light. This phenomenon, known as illuminant metamerism, underlies the difficulty faced by consumers of selecting matching fabric or paint colors in a store only to find that they appear not to match under home lighting. The frequency of illuminant metamerism has been evaluated only under single, uniform illuminants. However, in real world conditions, the spectral content of light falling on an object varies with direction (Morimoto et al. 2019), meaning that a surface will sample different spectra depending on its angle within the environment. Here we used computer-graphics techniques to simulate a pair of planar surfaces placed under newly measured hyperspectral illumination maps that quantify the directional variability of real-world lighting environments. We counted the instances of illuminant metamerism that can be solved simply by viewing surfaces tilted to a different direction. Results show that most instances of illuminant metamerism can in theory be resolved for both trichromatic and dichromatic observers. Color deficient observers benefit more than trichromats implying that the directional variability allows the recovery of the missing dimension in their colour vision systems. This study adds a new perspective to the classic trichromatic theory of human vision and emphasizes the importance of carefully considering the environments in which biological vision operates in daily life. It is striking that the physical directional variability available in natural lighting environments substantially mitigates the biological limitations of trichromacy or dichromacy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
9
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
19
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%