Daily glycome and transcriptome profiling reveals polysaccharide structures and glycosyltransferases critical for cotton fiber growth
Swaminathan, S.; Grover, C. E.; Mugisha, A. S.; Sichterman, L. E.; Lee, Y.; Yang, P.; Mallery, E. L.; Jareczek, J. J.; Leach, A. G.; Xie, J.; Wendel, J. F.; Szymanski, D. B.; Zabotina, O. A.
Show abstract
Cotton fiber length and strength are key determinants of its quality. Dynamic changes in the pectin, xyloglucan, xylan, and cellulose polysaccharide epitopes content during fiber growth contribute to complex remodeling of fiber cell wall (CW) and quality. Detailed knowledge about polysaccharide compositional and structural alteration in the fiber during fiber elongation and strengthening is vastly limited. Here, large-scale glycome profiling coupled with fiber phenotype and transcriptome profiling was conducted on fiber collected daily covering the most critical fiber developmental window. High temporal resolution profiling allowed us to identify specific polysaccharide epitopes associated with distinct fiber phenotypes that might contribute to fiber quality. This study revealed the critical role of highly branched RG-I pectin epitopes such as, {beta}-1,4-linked-galactans, {beta}-1,6-linked-galactans, and arabinogalactans, in addition to earlier reported homogalacturonans and xyloglucans in the formation of cotton-fiber-middle-lamella and contributing to fiber plasticity and elongation. We also propose the essential role of heteroxylans (Xyl-MeGlcA and Xyl-3Ar), as a guiding factor for secondary CW cellulose-microfibril arrangement, thus contributing to fiber strength. Correlation analysis of glycome and transcriptome data identified several key putative glycosyltransferases involved in synthesizing the critical polysaccharide epitopes. Novel details discovered here provide a foundation to identify molecular factors that dictate important fiber traits.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disruption of Brachypodium Lichenase Alters Metabolism of Mixed-linkage Glucan and Starch 93%
- GT61 β-1,2-xylosyltransferases define a conserved xylan modification in gymnosperm and Arabidopsis primary cell walls 93%
- Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of pea shoot development and cell-type-specific responses to boron deficiency 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative multi-omics profiling of Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense fibers at high temporal resolution reveals key differences in polysaccharide composition and associated glycosyltransferases 99%
- Transcriptomic analysis during fruit development of the oil palm revealed specific isozymes related to starch metabolism that control oil yield. 94%
- Unveiling unique metabolomic and transcriptomic profiles in three Brassicaceae crops 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Compensatory guaiacyl lignin biosynthesis at the expense of syringyl lignin in 4CL1-knockout poplar 94%
- Arabidopsis XTH4 and XTH9 contribute to wood cell expansion and secondary wall formation 94%
- BERBERINE BRIDGE ENZYME-LIKE OXIDASES OF CELLODEXTRINS AND MIXED-LINKED β-GLUCANS CONTROL SEED COAT FORMATION 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Asparagine accumulation in chicory storage roots is controlled by translocation and feedback regulation of asparagine biosynthesis in leaves 93%
- The biosynthesis, degradation, and function of cell wall β-xylosylated xyloglucan mirrors that of arabinoxyloglucan 92%
- Conifers exhibit a characteristic inactivation of auxin to maintain tissue homeostasis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Substrate specificity and functional conservation of SWEET10 transporter in pineapple 92%
- ABIOTIC STRESS GENE 1 mediates aroma volatiles accumulation by activating MdLOX1a in apple 91%
- Telomere-to-telomere, gap-free genome of mung beans (Vigna radiata) provides insights into domestication under structural variation 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.