Back

Pharmaco-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy gradually perturbs the cortex-wide excitation-inhibition balance

Xie, K.; Royer, J.; Rodriguez-Cruces, R.; Horwood, L.; Ngo, A.; Arafat, T.; Auer, H.; Sahlas, E.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.; Valk, S. L.; Hong, S.-J.; Frauscher, B.; Pana, R.; Bernasconi, A.; Bernasconi, N.; Concha, L.; Bernhardt, B. C.

2024-04-27 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.04.22.590555 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWExcitation-inhibition (E/I) imbalance is theorized as a key mechanism in the pathophysiology of epilepsy, with a mounting body of previous research focusing on elucidating its cellular manifestations. However, there are limited studies into E/I imbalance at macroscale and its microcircuit-level mechanisms and clinical associations. In our current work, we computed the Hurst exponent--a previously validated index of the E/I ratio--from resting-state fMRI time series, and simulated microcircuit parameters using biophysical computational models. We found a broad reduction in the Hurst exponent in pharmaco-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), indicative of a shift towards more excitable network dynamics. Connectome decoders pointed to temporolimbic and frontocentral areas as plausible network epicenters of E/I imbalance. Computational simulations further revealed that enhancing cortical excitability in patients likely reflected atypical increases in recurrent connection strength of local neuronal ensembles. Moreover, mixed cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses revealed heightened E/I elevation in patients with longer disease duration, more frequent electroclinical seizures and inter-ictal epileptic spikes, and worse cognitive functioning. Replicated in an independent dataset, our work provides compelling in-vivo evidence of a macroscale shift in E/I balance in TLE patients that undergoes progressive changes and underpins cognitive impairments, potentially informing treatment strategies targeting E/I mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.