In silico design of stable single-domain antibodies with high affinity
Van Der Kant, R.; Zhang, Z.; Markovic, I.; Vizarraga, D.; Garcia, T.; Maragkou, K.; Delgado Blanco, J.; Cianferoni, D.; Orlando, G.; Cia, G.; Geukens, N.; Carolis, C.; Volkov, A. N.; Savvides, S. N.; DeWilde, M.; Schymkowitz, J.; Serrano Pubul, L.; Rousseau, F.
Show abstract
Antibody-based therapeutics have become indispensable in modern medicine, but traditional methods of antibody discovery often present with limitations in developability, cross-reactivity, and ethical concerns. While deep learning and generative approaches have shown promise in the design of high affinity protein binders, de novo antibody design remains challenging. Here, we present EvolveX, a structure-based computational pipeline for designing antibody fragments. EvolveX utilizes ModelX and empirical force field FoldX to optimize complementarity- determining regions (CDRs) and TANGO for aggregation analysis. We demonstrate the ability of EvolveX to redesign a single-domain VHH antibody fragment targeting mouse Vsig4 to address two challenges: enhancing stability and affinity for the original target and redesigning it for high affinity to the human ortholog. The redesigned variants of VHH fragments specific to mouse Vsig4 showed improved physicochemical properties, while retaining binding affinities comparable to the original version. Notably, EvolveX improved the binding affinity of VHHs to human Vsig4 by over 1000-fold, transforming low-affinity binders into nanomolar-affinity molecules. Structural analyses by X-ray crystallography and NMR confirmed the accuracy of the designs, which display optimized interactions with the antigen. NGS and re-modelling analysis further demonstrated the efficiency of FoldX-based design pipeline. Collectively, our study highlights EvolveXs potential to overcome current limitations in antibody design, offering a powerful tool for the development of next-generation therapeutics with enhanced specificity, stability, and efficacy.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ProT-Diff: A Modularized and Efficient Approach to De Novo Generation of Antimicrobial Peptide Sequences through Integration of Protein Language Model and Diffusion Model 92%
- IgG-Bridging-Seeded Synergistic Aggregation of SARS-CoV-2 Spikes Underlies Potent Neutralization by A Low-Affinity Antibody 92%
- TCRpcDist: Estimating TCR physico-chemical similarity to analyze repertoires and predict specificities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of AlphaFold Antibody-Antigen Modeling with Implications for Improving Predictive Accuracy 95%
- Learning Peptide Recognition Rules for a Low-Specificity Protein 94%
- Deep Mutational Scanning Reveals a De Novo Disulfide Bond and Combinatorial Mutations for Engineering Thermostable Myoglobin 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Contextualising the developability risk of antibodies with lambda light chains using enhanced therapeutic antibody profiling 94%
- Biophysical cartography of the native and human-engineered antibody landscapes quantifies the plasticity of antibody developability 94%
- Unusual traits shape the architecture of the Ig ancestor molecule 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.