Back

Parallel genetic adaptation amidst a background of changing effective population sizes in divergent yellow perch (Perca flavescens) populations

Yin, X.; Schraidt, C.; Sparks, M.; Euclide, P.; Hoyt, T.; Ruetz, C.; Höök, T.; Christie, M.

2024-12-15 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.04.21.590447 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aquatic ecosystems are highly dynamic environments vulnerable to natural and anthropogenic disturbances. High-economic value fisheries are one of many ecosystem services affected by these disturbances and it is critical to accurately characterize the genetic diversity and effective population sizes of valuable fish stocks through time. We used genome-wide data to reconstruct the demographic histories of economically important yellow perch (Perca flavescens) populations. In two isolated and genetically divergent populations, we provide independent evidence for simultaneous increases in effective population sizes over both historic and contemporary time scales including negative genome-wide estimates of Tajimas D, 3.1 times more SNPs than adjacent populations, and contemporary effective population sizes that have increased 10- and 47-fold from their minimum, respectively. The excess of segregating sites and negative Tajimas D values likely arose from mutations accompanying historic population expansions with insufficient time for purifying selection, whereas linkage disequilibrium-based estimates of Ne also suggest contemporary increases that may have been driven by reduced fishing pressure or environmental remediation. We also identified parallel, genetic adaptation to reduced visual clarity in the same two habitats. These results suggest that the synchrony of key ecological and evolutionary processes can drive parallel demographic and evolutionary trajectories across independent populations.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.