The role of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for non-primary lung cancer: Umbrella review of meta-analyses
Woo, W.; Park, B.; Ahadi, A.; Chung, L. I.-y.; Jung, C. M.; Bharat, A.; Chae, Y. K.
Show abstract
IntroductionDue to heterogeneous characteristics of primary cancers, the efficacy of pulmonary metastasectomy(PM) in non-primary lung cancers has not been investigated other than colorectal cancers. This study aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of PM for non-primary lung cancer. MethodsA systematic search for meta-analyses on PM for non-primary lung cancers was conducted, encompassing publications up to January 3, 2024. The analysis included seven primary cancer types: renal cell, breast, adrenocortical, head and neck cancers, melanoma, germ cell tumors, and sarcoma. Primary outcomes, overall survival, and recurrence rates post-PM were assessed using random-effect models to account for study heterogeneity. ResultsThis study included 16 systematic-review articles and 101 individual studies, involving 10,277 patients who underwent PM for non-primary lung cancer. Patients had a mean age of 48.0 years, with 68.4% being male. About half of the patients(47.1% [95%CI 40.8-53.5] presented with multiple metastatic lesions, and complete R0 resection achieved in 87.2% [95%CI 83.0-90.8]. The pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) rate post-PM was 41.2% [95%CI, 37.1-45.4%]. Patients with germ cell tumors demonstrated significantly higher survival rate than other cancers(p<0.05), while patients with melanoma exhibited the poorest outcome(p<0.05). During follow-up, 57.6%[95%CI 46.4-68.1] had recurrence; 48% of them had intrathoracic-only recurrence and 52% had extra-thoracic recurrence. ConclusionThis study underscores the survival benefits associated with PM. Overall survival rates following PM do not significantly differ based on primary cancer types, except for germ cell tumors and melanoma. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing and incorporating PM into clinical practice when appropriate. SynopsisSurgical resection for pulmonary metastasis from cancers other than lung cancer still holds a significant role in improving a patients prognosis. Though the recurrence rate is high, it could improve the chance of survival regardless of the primary cancer types.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct metastatic organotropism shapes prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis 92%
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 91%
- Hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for the intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival benefit of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resected esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a SEER-based retrospective cohort study 94%
- Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor Expression Correlates with Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Poor Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simplified Molecular Classification of Lung Adenocarcinomas Based on EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 Mutations 93%
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 92%
- A Large Scale Multi-dataset Investigation of Brain Metastases Distribution Based on Primary Cancer Type 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating serum miRNAs predict response to platinum chemotherapy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer 91%
- Added-value of whole exome and RNA Sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel 90%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.