Utility Analyses of AVITI Sequencing Chemistry
Liu, S.; Obert, C.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Ren, B.; Wiseman, K.; Krajacich, B. J.; Wang, W.; Metcalfe, K.; Smith, M.; Ben-Yehezkel, T.; Luo, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundDNA sequencing is a critical tool in modern biology. Over the last two decades, it has been revolutionized by the advent of massively parallel sequencing, leading to significant advances in the genome and transcriptome sequencing of various organisms. Nevertheless, challenges with accuracy, lack of competitive options and prohibitive costs associated with high throughput parallel short-read sequencing persist. ResultsHere, we conduct a comparative analysis using matched DNA and RNA short-reads assays between Element Biosciences AVITI and Illuminas NextSeq 550 chemistries. Similar comparisons were evaluated for synthetic long-read sequencing for RNA and targeted single-cell transcripts between the AVITI and Illuminas NovaSeq 6000. For both DNA and RNA short-read applications, the study found that the AVITI produced significantly higher per sequence quality scores. For PCR-free DNA libraries, we observed an average 89.7% lower experimentally determined error rate when using the AVITI chemistry, compared to the NextSeq 550. For short-read RNA quantification, AVITI platform had an average of 32.5% lower error rate than that for NextSeq 550. With regards to synthetic long-read mRNA and targeted synthetic long read single cell mRNA sequencing, both platforms respective chemistries performed comparably in quantification of genes and isoforms. The AVITI displayed a marginally lower error rate for long reads, with fewer chemistry-specific errors and a higher mutation detection rate. ConclusionThese results point to the potential of the AVITI platform as a competitive candidate in high-throughput short read sequencing analyses when juxtaposed with the Illumina NextSeq 550.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Oligonucleotide Capture Sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome and Subgenomic Fragments from COVID-19 Individuals 96%
- Nanopore Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Comparison of Short and Long PCR-tiling Amplicon Protocols 96%
- Performance of amplicon and capture based next-generation sequencing approaches for the epidemiological surveillance of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 and other variants of concern. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of PCR duplication on RNA-seq data generated using NovaSeq 6000, NovaSeq X, AVITI and G4 sequencers. 96%
- LeafGo: Leaf to Genome, a quick workflow to produce high-quality De novo genomes with Third Generation Sequencing technology 95%
- Prime-seq, efficient and powerful bulk RNA-sequencing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chromosome-scale assembly comparison of the Korean Reference Genome KOREF from PromethION and PacBio with Hi-C mapping information 95%
- Comparison of long read methods for sequencing and assembly of a plant genome 95%
- A high-quality Genome and Comparison of Short versus Long Read Transcriptome of the Palaearctic duck Aythya fuligula (Tufted Duck) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A modular pipeline for evidence-integrated genome annotation across species: a case study on Schmidtea mediterranea 94%
- ACoRE: Accurate SARS-CoV-2 genome reconstruction for the characterization of intra-host and inter-host viral diversity in clinical samples and for the evaluation of re-infections 94%
- Establishment of an eHAP1 Human Haploid Cell Line Hybrid Reference Genome Assembled from Short and Long Reads 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.