Back

The geometry of prey capture in praying mantis forelegs

Dan, S. D.; Taylor, D. S.; Yockey, J.; Svenson, G. J.; Martin, J. P.

2024-04-22 zoology
10.1101/2024.04.18.590067 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The form of an animals limbs has to balance multiple functions: locomotion, grasping, climbing, and jumping, among others. For cryptic animals, especially those that resemble elements of their habitat like sticks or grasses, the limbs may also be modified to enhance the camouflage. The performance of a limb in one category may require a tradeoff, reducing performance in another category. Praying mantises provide a diverse group of insects who all use their forelegs for one function, capturing prey, while some species use them as part of their camouflage. Here we use a large database of images of mantis species to capture the variation in morphology across the order, and to calculate the largest prey that their forelegs can hold. We find that the length and thickness of the femur and the length of the tibia comprise most of the variability across species. The majority of species have similar foreleg morphology, with two large groups extending into areas of the morphospace with thicker or thinner forelegs. A geometric relationship between dimensions of the foreleg and the optimal prey diameter maps directly onto the variability across species determined by principal components analysis; legs with thinner femurs and shorter tibia cant hold large prey, and the distribution of the species across the morphospace follows the gradient of optimum prey size. These results suggest that some species trade ability to grasp larger prey for benefits including crypsis, and the praying mantises are an ideal system for studying morphological and functional variation in limbs.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Integrative Organismal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
4
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
5
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.4%
9
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
11
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
13
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
14
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
16
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Integrative and Comparative Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
21
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
23
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
Journal of Avian Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
27
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
28
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
29
The Anatomical Record
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%