Understanding the characteristic behavior of the wild-type and mutant protein structure of FLT3 protein by computational methods
Younus, S.; Tatli, O.; Nasimian, A.; Kazi, J. U.; Rönnstrand, L.
Show abstract
FLT3 emerges as a commonly mutated protein with significant prognostic implications in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Point mutations or deletions in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) at the activation loop and internal tandem duplications (ITD) in the juxtamembrane (JM) region (and less commonly in the TKD) are the primary mutations that occur in the FLT3 protein. Besides, AML treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitor drugs may result in the acquisition of TKD mutations in the FLT3-ITD structure. All these mutations will induce activation of the kinase activity of FLT3 protein leading to activation of downstream signaling pathways. Therefore, finding better therapeutics against each of these mutant FLT3 proteins is crucial in the treatment of AML. This study aims to comprehend the characteristic behavior of TKD mutants (C and F in Y842), ITD mutants, and the combination of ITD with TKD mutations (C and F in Y842) in the FLT3 protein through computational approaches, including Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulation, cluster analysis, and machine learning techniques. The MD simulation studies revealed the alterations in the optimized state, flexibility, and compactness nature between FLT3-WT and mutated FLT3 proteins and identified significant changes in the point mutants, ITD, and the combined ITD and TKD mutated FLT3 protein structures. Cluster analysis also confirmed that these mutations significantly impact the overall flexibility of the protein structures, especially in the point-mutated structures of FLT3-Y842C and FLT3-ITD-Y842F. These findings emphasize the diverse protein conformations of mutated structures of the FLT3 protein, contributing to the deregulation of FLT3 protein function, and identified these mutated proteins as promising therapeutic targets in the treatment of AML.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An insight into SARS-CoV-2 Membrane protein interaction with Spike, Envelope, and Nucleocapsid proteins 98%
- Optimized structure of monoubiquitinated FANCD2 (human) at Lys 561: a theoretical approach 98%
- Investigating the role of N-terminal domain in phosphodiesterase 4B-inhibition by molecular dynamics simulation 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- iBRAB: in silico based-designed Broad-spectrum Fab against H1N1 Influenza A Virus 97%
- Molecular dynamics simulations reveal the selectivity mechanism of structurally similar agonists to TLR7 and TLR8 97%
- Identification of Natural Antiviral Drug Candidates Against Tilapia Lake Virus: Computational Drug Design Approaches 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanistic insights into the deleterious role of nasu-hakola disease associated TREM2 variants 98%
- In Silico Analysis Predicting Effects of Deleterious SNPs of Human RASSF5 Gene on its Structure and Functions 97%
- The Hidden Potential of PDE4 Inhibitor Rolipram: A Multifaceted Examination of its Inhibition of MMP2/9 Reveals Therapeutic Implications 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- In Silico Identification of Potential Inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA Gyrase from Phytoconstituents of Indian Medicinal Plants 97%
- A method for predicting linear and conformational B-cell epitopes in an antigen from its primary sequence 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 governs mutational instability and assists in making new SARS-CoV-2 variants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular Insights into the Differential Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern (VOCs) 97%
- Multiple Dimerizing Motifs Modulate the Dimerizations of the Syndecan Transmembrane Domains 96%
- In Silico Identification Of Novel PRFA Inhibitors To Fight Listeriosis: A Virtual Screening And Molecular Dynamics Studies 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.