Back

Cardiovascular Health Effects and Synthetic Cooling Agents in E-cigarettes Labeled as "Clear" Marketed in Massachusetts After the Tobacco Product Flavoring Ban

Minetti, E. T.; Erythropel, H. C.; Keith, R.; Davis, D. R.; Zimmerman, J. B.; Krishnan-Sarin, S.; Hamburg, N. M.

2024-04-19 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.04.18.24305863 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionMassachusetts (MA) enacted statewide regulation on all flavored tobacco products in June 2020. Thereafter, electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) labeled clear emerged on the market. We aimed to combine cardiovascular health effects with chemical analysis of clear e-cigarettes. MethodsWe measured acute changes in blood pressure and heart rate following a 10-minute structured use of participants own e-cigarette, comparing clear e-cigarette users with other flavored e-cigarette users and non-users. Chemical characterization and quantification of relevant flavorings and cooling agents (WS-3, WS-23) of 19 clear-labeled disposable e-cigarette liquids was carried out by GC/MS. ResultsAfter the ban, participants that used clear labeled e-cigarettes increased from 0% to 21%. Increase in diastolic blood pressure and heart rate was significantly greater in clear e-cigarettes users (n=22) compared to both non-clear flavored e-cigarette users (n=114) and non-users (n=72). We saw similar results in heart rate when comparing Juul e-cigarette and clear users; Juul was used as a reference as synthetic coolants WS-3 or WS-23 were not detected in these. All (19/19) clear e-liquids were found to contain synthetic cooling agents WS-23 and/or WS-3, menthol (18/19), as well as other flavorings (12/19). DiscussionThe detected presence of menthol alongside other flavorings in tested clear products is a direct violation of the MA flavored tobacco product regulation, warranting stricter monitoring for new products and constituents. clear e-cigarette use led to greater hemodynamic effects compared to other flavored e-cigarettes and Juul, which raises questions about the effect of cooling agents on users.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.