Back

Integrating Preconception Risk Assessment and Counseling with Primary Health Care: A Feasibility Assessment

Dunlop, A. L.; Alfonso, S.; Hansen, N.; Williams, D. M.; Marshall, A. L.; Anderson, V. M.

2024-04-19 primary care research
10.1101/2024.04.17.24305399 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProfessional association recommendations call for integrating preconception health promotion with primary care, yet there are scarce tools and implementation research to support practices in doing so. PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of integrating a preconception health digital risk assessment and virtual coaching into womens primary care encounters. MethodsIn the Emory Family Medicine Clinic (Atlanta, Georgia), female patients 21-40 years of age with a well-woman or chronic condition encounter scheduled between 9/1/2022 and 5/1/2023 were invited to participate. Consenting patients were provided the Frame Your Future weblink to complete the digital risk assessment followed by virtual counseling, and their family physicians were provided with a pdf summary to discuss during the primary care encounter. Demographic and clinical information was collected via medical record abstraction and patient and physician experiences via survey. ResultsOf 46 enrolled patients, 44 (96%) made a Frame account, 38 (86%) completed the risk assessment, 34 (89%) completed virtual coaching, and 24 (71%) had a physician discuss their preconception health assessment during the primary care encounter. Nearly 80% of patients reported an increase in confidence in discussing fertility with their physician, and 50% reported they would not otherwise have brought up fertility and preconception health during the encounter. Both patients and physicians were satisfied with the process and viewed it as helping motivate positive changes in patient health and health behaviors. ConclusionThe completion of preconception digital risk assessment and virtual counseling facilitates discussion of preconception health during primary care encounters and shows promise for improving womens health.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
7
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
12
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
19
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
23
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%