Back

Calculating Protein-Ligand Residence Times Through State Predictive Information Bottleneck based Enhanced Sampling

Lee, S.; Wang, D.; Seeliger, M.; Tiwary, P.

2024-04-20 biophysics
10.1101/2024.04.16.589710 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding drug residence times in target proteins is key to improving drug efficacy and understanding target recognition in biochemistry. While drug residence time is just as important as binding affinity, atomiclevel understanding of drug residence times through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations has been difficult primarily due to the extremely long timescales. Recent advances in rare event sampling have allowed us to reach these timescales, yet predicting protein-ligand residence times remains a significant challenge. Here we present a semi-automated protocol to calculate the ligand residence times across 12 orders of magnitudes of timescales. In our proposed framework, we integrate a deep learning-based method, the state predictive information bottleneck (SPIB), to learn an approximate reaction coordinate (RC) and use it to guide the enhanced sampling method metadynamics. We demonstrate the performance of our algorithm by applying it to six different protein-ligand complexes with available benchmark residence times, including the dissociation of the widely studied anti-cancer drug Imatinib (Gleevec) from both wild-type Abl kinase and drug-resistant mutants. We show how our protocol can recover quantitatively accurate residence times, potentially opening avenues for deeper insights into drug development possibilities and ligand recognition mechanisms. TOC Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=107 SRC="FIGDIR/small/589710v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (27K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11dc13borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@79103dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@194b67org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a570e3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.5%
4
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.4%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
8
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
9
Journal of Computational Chemistry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
12
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
14
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
16
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
19
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
21
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%