Dense Investigation of Variability in Affect (DIVA): A Neuroimaging Study of Premenopausal Female Participants
Bottenhorn, K. L.; Salo, T.; Peraza, J. A.; Riedel, M. C.; Flannery, J. S.; Kimbler, A.; Toll, A.; Suarez, D.; Cruz, F. M.; Zagales, I.; Caldes, N.; Dolan, O.; Zagales, R.; Sutherland, M.; Laird, R. W.; Laird, A. R.
Show abstract
The rise of large neuroimaging datasets and multi-dataset mega-analyses brings the power to study interindividual differences in brain structure and function on a heretofore unseen scale. However, unknown and poorly characterized intra-individual variability continues to undermine the detection of robust brain-behavior associations and, ultimately, our understanding of the brain on the whole. Womens and reproductive health underlie variability in more than half of the population, but have long been overlooked in the study of both inter- and intra-individual differences in the brain. To this end, the Dense Investigation of Variability in Affect (DIVA) Study was designed to study intra-individual variability in the brain and behavior across the menstrual cycle in a small cohort of premenopausal female participants. The DIVA Study acquired weekly actigraphy, self-report, biospecimen, and both functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging data with concurrent peripheral physiological recordings. These data facilitate the study of several common sources of variability in the brain and behavior: the menstrual cycle and ovarian hormones, sleep, stress, exercise, and exogenous sources of hemodynamic variability.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Custom-molded headcases have limited efficacy in reducing head motion during naturalistic fMRI experiments 97%
- Act Natural: Functional Connectivity from Naturalistic Stimuli fMRI Outperforms Resting-State in Predicting Brain Activity 96%
- Is it Time to Switch Your T1W Sequence? Assessing the Impact of Prospective Motion Correction on the Reliability and Quality of Structural Imaging 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of analytic decisions on test-retest reliability of individual and group estimates in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a multiverse analysis using the monetary incentive delay task 97%
- The efficacy of resting-state fMRI denoising pipelines for motion correction and behavioural prediction. 96%
- A Set of FMRI Quality Control Tools in AFNI: Systematic, in-depth and interactive QC with afni_proc.py and more 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.