Back

Functional cardiac consequences of β-adrenergic stress-induced injury in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Earl, C. C.; Javier, A. J.; Richards, A. M.; Markham, L. W.; Goergen, C. J.; Welc, S. S.

2024-04-20 physiology
10.1101/2024.04.15.589650 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cardiomyopathy is the leading cause of death in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), however, in the mdx mouse model of DMD, the cardiac phenotype differs from that seen in DMD-associated cardiomyopathy. Although some have used pharmacologic stress to enhance the cardiac phenotype in the mdx model, many methods lead to high mortality, variable cardiac outcomes, and do not recapitulate the structural and functional cardiac changes seen in human disease. Here, we describe a simple and effective method to enhance the cardiac phenotype model in mdx mice using advanced 2D and 4D high-frequency ultrasound to monitor cardiac dysfunction progression in vivo. For our study, mdx and wild-type (WT) mice received daily low-dose (2 mg/kg/day) isoproterenol injections for 10 days. Histopathologic assessment showed that isoproterenol treatment increased myocyte injury, elevated serum cardiac troponin I levels, and enhanced fibrosis in mdx mice. Ultrasound revealed reduced ventricular function, decreased wall thickness, increased volumes, and diminished cardiac reserve in mdx mice compared to wild-type. Our findings highlight the utility of low-dose isoproterenol in mdx mice as a valuable model for exploring therapies targeting DMD-associated cardiac complications. SUMMARY STATEMENTThis work introduces an improved method to model heart failure in mouse models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and comprehensively describes underlying cellular and physiologic mechanisms using advanced imaging techniques.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.