Parallel comparison reveals conservation and re-wiring of abiotic stress response networks across three plant species
Lee, J. M.; Mutwil-Anderwald, D.; Goh, J. C.; Mutwil, M.
Show abstract
Abiotic stresses trigger significant alterations in plant morphology, yield, and nutrient composition. To counter these stresses, plants have developed strategies involving gene expression adjustments, impacting their growth and development to ensure survival and reproduction. Although transcriptomic studies have extensively examined stress responses, our understanding of their conservation remains limited. We conducted a comprehensive study on the effects of 24 different environmental and nutrient conditions on the growth yield of three hydroponically grown leafy crops (cai xin, lettuce, and spinach). This research identified optimal conditions for maximizing yield and vitamin content and pinpointed conditions that induce abiotic stress. Our findings highlight the substantial impact of stress on various plant functions, with photosynthesis playing a pivotal role in vitamin content regulation. A detailed comparative analysis of gene expression across these crops revealed conserved gene sets potentially crucial for abiotic stress response. Furthermore, we introduced a novel method that merges regression and genomics to construct reliable gene regulatory networks for stress response. Despite significant conservation of these networks among the studied crops, their key transcription factors showed limited similarity to those in Arabidopsis thaliana, suggesting notable functional divergence. To give easy access to the data and comparative transcriptomic tools, we established StressPlantTools, an public online database (https://stress.sbs.ntu.edu.sg/), facilitating further research into stress-responsive genes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-Omics Exploration of ABA Involvement in Identifying Unique Molecular Markers for Single and Combined Stresses in tomato plants 97%
- Elucidating the unknown transcriptional responses and PHR1 mediated biotic and abiotic stress tolerance during phosphorus-limitation 97%
- Arabidopsis CPK6 regulates drought tolerance under high nitrogen by the phosphorylation of NRT1.1 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Drought and recovery in barley: key gene networks and retrotransposon response. 97%
- Temporal Gene Expression in Apical Culms Shows Early Changes in Cell Wall Biosynthesis Genes in Sugarcane 96%
- The molecular basis of Kale domestication: Transcription profiling of leaves and meristems provides new insights into the evolution of a Brassica oleracea vegetative morphotype 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Specific ABA-independent tomato transcriptome reprogramming under abiotic stress combination 97%
- Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of pea shoot development and cell-type-specific responses to boron deficiency 97%
- The transcriptome of soybean reproductive tissues subjected to water deficit, heat stress, and a combination of water deficit and heat stress. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene co-expression networks highlight key nodes associated with Ammonium nitrate in sugarcane 97%
- Changes in SWEET-mediated sugar partitioning affect photosynthesis performance and plant response to drought 96%
- The impact of water deficit and heat stress combination on the molecular response, physiology and seed production of soybean 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ammonium regulates the development and architecture of pine roots through hormonal crosstalk and differential expression of transcription factors in the apex 96%
- Genome-wide association study, network analysis, and reverse genetics pinpoint novel genes associated with seedling root growth variation of Arabidopsis thaliana under drought 96%
- Constitutive expression of JASMONATE RESISTANT 1 elevates content of several jasmonates and primes Arabidopsis thaliana to better withstand drought 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.