Enhancing system empathy within a UK Emergency Department: A feasibility interprofessional priority setting exercise
Howick, J.; Ward, A.; Grantham, C.; Bennett-Weston, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundSystem-level barriers inhibit empathy in healthcare, and this can harm patients and practitioners. The barriers include burnout-inducing administrative workloads, burdensome protocols, lack of wellbeing spaces, un-empathic leadership, and not emphasising empathy as an institutional value. A workshop aimed at enhancing empathic systems was successfully delivered in Canada but has not been tested in the UK National Health Service (NHS) setting. AimTo test the feasibility of an empathic systems workshop within the UK NHS setting. MethodsWe conducted an interprofessional group of an emergency department (ED). We used a modified nominal group technique to prioritise actions to enhance empathy in the ED system. Satisfaction with the workshop and confidence that the workshop would lead to change were measured on a 10-point Likert scale. ResultsTwenty-eight participants representing the following stakeholder groups attended the workshop: leaders, consultants, nurses, security, and porters. The group agreed to generating a better wellbeing action plan and implementing an effective secondary triage system. Seventy-three percent (73%) rated their satisfaction with the workshop as 8 or higher out of ten, and 63% reported being confident that the workshop would lead to positive change. LimitationsA doctors strike limited the range of stakeholders who were able to attend, and long-term follow up was not conducted. ConclusionsParticipants in a UK setting were satisfied with a previously developed system empathy workshop and reported being confident that it would lead to positive change. Participants were able to prioritise changes that would improve system empathy and were confident that the changes would be effective.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 96%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 96%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 95%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 94%
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 93%
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A System Dynamics Model for Effects of Workplace Violence and Clinician Burnout on Agitation Management in the Emergency Department 94%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 93%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 95%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 94%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.