Back

Assessment and phenotypic identification of millet germplasm (Setaria italica ) in Liaoning, China

LI, X.-t.; HE, W.-F.; WANG, H.-h.; Xu, M.

2024-04-16 genetics
10.1101/2024.04.14.589429 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimsThis study evaluated millet germplasms in Liaoning Province to support the collection, preservation and innovation of millet germplasm resources. MethodsThe study was conducted from 2018 to 2020, involved the selection of 105 millet germplasm resources from the Germplasm Bank of the Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences (LAAS), the observation and recording of 31 traits, and the application of multivariate analysis methods to assess phenotypic diversity. ResultsFrom the diversity analysis and correlation analysis, it was found that the tested traits had abundant diversity and complex correlations among them. principal component analysis (PCA) comprehensively analyzed all quantitative traits and extracted 7 principal components. Grey relational analysis (GRA) highlighted the varied contributions of different traits to yield. Through systematic cluster analysis, the resources were categorized into six groups at Euclidean distance of 17.09. K-mean cluster analysis determined the distribution interval and central value of each trait, then identified resources with desirable traits. ConclusionThe results revealed resources that possess characteristics such as upthrow seedling leaves, more tillers and branches, larger and well-formed ears, and lodging resistance prefer to higher grain yield. It was also discovered that the subear internode length (SIL) could be an indicator for maturity selection. Four specific resources, namely, Dungu No. 1, Xiao-li-xiang, Basen Shengu, and Yuhuanggu No. 1, were identified for further breeding and practical applications.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.