Contribution of autosomal rare and de novo variants to sex differences in autism
Koko, M. E.; Satterstrom, F. K.; Autism Sequencing Consortium, ; APEX consortium, ; Warrier, V.; Martin, H. C.
Show abstract
Autism is four times more prevalent in males than females. To study whether this reflects a difference in genetic predisposition attributed to autosomal rare variants, we evaluated the sex differences in effect size of damaging protein-truncating and missense variants on autism predisposition in 47,061 autistic individuals, then compared effect sizes between individuals with and without cognitive impairment or motor delay. Although these variants mediated differential likelihood of autism with versus without motor or cognitive impairment, their effect sizes on the liability scale did not differ significantly by sex exome-wide or in genes sex-differentially expressed in the cortex. Although de novo mutations were enriched in genes with male-biased expression in the fetal cortex, the liability they conferred did not differ significantly from other genes with similar loss-of-function intolerance and sex-averaged cortical expression. In summary, autosomal rare coding variants confer similar liability for autism in females and males.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of autism recurrence risk by direct assessment of paternal sperm mosaicism 95%
- Identification of 64 new risk loci for major depression, refinement of the genetic architecture and risk prediction of recurrence and comorbidities 94%
- Multi-ancestry study of the genetics of problematic alcohol use in >1 million individuals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide rare variant score associates with morphological subtypes of autism spectrum disorder 96%
- Integrative genomics identifies a convergent molecular subtype that links epigenomic with transcriptomic differences in autism 96%
- Structural models of genome-wide covariance identify multiple common dimensions in autism 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.