Back

SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells

Zhang, S.; El-Deiry, W. S.

2024-04-15 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.04.12.589252 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and COVID-19 infection has led to worsened outcomes for patients with cancer. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein mediates host cell infection and cell-cell fusion that causes stabilization of tumor suppressor p53 protein. In-silico analysis previously suggested that SARS-CoV-2 spike interacts with p53 directly but this putative interaction has not been demonstrated in cells. We examined the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike, p53 and MDM2 (E3 ligase, which mediates p53 degradation) in cancer cells using an immunoprecipitation assay. We observed that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interrupts p53-MDM2 protein interaction but did not detect SARS-CoV-2 spike bound with p53 protein in the cancer cells. We further observed that SARS-CoV-2 spike suppresses p53 transcriptional activity in cancer cells including after nutlin exposure of wild-type p53-, spike S2-expressing tumor cells and inhibits chemotherapy-induced p53 gene activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2. The suppressive effect of SARS-CoV-2 spike on p53-dependent gene activation provides a potential molecular mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 infection may impact tumorigenesis, tumor progression and chemotherapy sensitivity. In fact, cisplatin-treated tumor cells expressing spike S2 were found to have increased cell viability as compared to control cells. Further observations on {gamma}-H2AX expression in spike S2-expressing cells treated with cisplatin may indicate altered DNA damage sensing in the DNA damage response pathway. The preliminary observations reported here warrant further studies to unravel the impact of SARS-CoV-2 and its various encoded proteins including spike on pathways of tumorigenesis and response to cancer therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.7%
5
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
6
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
7
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Cell Cycle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
13
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
15
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
19
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
20
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
26
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
27
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Molecular and Cellular Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%