Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
de Oliveira Andrade, L. J.; Matos de Oliveira, G. C.; Matos de Oliveira, L. C.; Montargil Rocha, R.; Matos de Oliveira, L.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe assessment of glycemic control is fundamental for diabetes management. However, traditional measures have limitations, including susceptibility to non-glycemic factors. To address these limitations, there is a growing need for personalized metrics of glycemic control that take into account individual variability and provide a more comprehensive assessment of glycemic response. ObjectiveTo develop the Individualized Glycemic Index (IGI) as a new marker of glycemic control. Methods: A simulated dataset representing individuals with varied glycemic profiles, including fasting glucose levels, glycemic variability measures, glycemic response to foods, HbA1c, fructosamine, and other relevant factors, was created. An algorithm was implemented in the Python language using designated libraries. We evaluated: the algorithms performance using simulated data with known glycemic control outcomes; the algorithms ability to accurately predict glycemic control based on the provided data; the algorithms performance with glycemic control analyses. ResultsThe IGI algorithm uses a comprehensive set of input data to provide a personalized assessment of glycemic control. A program in Python language was developed to calculate the IGI, with a comprehensive metric for evaluating glycemic control. The structured algorithm incorporated the most relevant factors to create a program taking into account each patients individuality. ConclusionThe IGI provides a more comprehensive and personalized assessment of glycemic control, which may improve diabetes management and outcomes, becoming a promising marker of glycemic control that surpasses the limitations of traditional measures.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpreting blood GLUcose data with R package iglu 95%
- Optimization of nutritional strategies using a mechanistic computational model in prediabetes: Application to the J-DOIT1 study data 94%
- The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention: The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical interpretation of machine learning models for prediction of diabetic complications using electronic health records 95%
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 91%
- Clinical Study Applying Machine Learning to Detect a Rare Disease: Results and Lessons Learned 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced Formulation of Precision Probiotics through Active Machine Learning 91%
- A Prospective Cohort Study to Develop Multi-Biomarkers Panel to Define Biological Ageing in Five Different Cohorts from Newborn to Oldest Adult: A Study Protocol 88%
- Prediction of high-risk liver cancer patients from their mutation profile: Benchmarking of mutation calling techniques 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes in diabetes patients admitted with COVID-19 in Dubai: a cross-sectional single centre study. 92%
- Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences in a national cohort in the United States 89%
- Uncovering clinical risk factors and prediction of severe COVID-19: A machine learning approach based on UK Biobank data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive validation of fasting- and oral glucose tolerance test-based indices of insulin secretion against gold-standard measures 93%
- Time In Range, as measured by continuous glucose monitor, as a predictor of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes– A systemic review 93%
- Insulin pricing and other major diabetes-related concerns in the USA: A study of 46,407 Tweets between 2017 and 2019 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.