Back

CHAPAS-4 trial: second-line anchor drugs for children with HIV in Africa

Bwakura-Dangarembizi, M.; Szubert, A. J.; Mumbiro, V.; Kityo, C.; Lugemwa, A.; Doerholt, K.; Chabala, C.; Nyathi, M.; Nduna, B.; Burger, D.; Shakeshaft, C.; Nathoo, K.; Musiime, V.; Yawe, I.; South, A.; Lungu, J.; Ndebele, W.; Mwamabazi, M.; Griffiths, A.; Nazzinda, R.; Zimba, K.; Zhang, Y.; Walker, S.; Turkova, A.; Walker, A. S.; Bamford, A.; Gibb, D. M.; CHAPAS-4 Trial Team,

2024-04-15 hiv aids
10.1101/2024.04.12.24305333 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildren living with HIV requiring second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) have limited options, an unmet need considering children require life-long ART. MethodsChildren from Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe were randomised to one of four second-line anchor drugs: dolutegravir(DTG), ritonavir-boosted darunavir(DRV/r), atazanavir(ATV/r), or lopinavir(LPV/r) in the factorial CHAPAS-4 trial (second randomisation to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate(TAF) or standard-of-care(SOC) backbone, reported elsewhere). Dosing followed WHO weight-bands. The primary endpoint was viral load(VL) <400copies/mL at week-96, analysed using logistic regression, hypothesising that DTG and DRV/r would be superior (threshold p=0.03) to LPV/r and ATV/r arms combined and ATV/r would be non-inferior to LPV/r(12% margin). Secondary endpoints included immunology and safety. Analyses were intention-to-treat. Results919 children, median(IQR) age 10(8-13) years, 54% male, baseline VL 17,573(5549,55700) copies/mL, CD4 669(413, 971) cells/mm3, weight-for-age Z-score -1.6(-2.4,-0.9), had spent median(IQR) 5.6(3.3,7.8) years on first-line ART. At week-96, DTG was superior (by 9.7%(95% CI 4.8%, 14.5%); p<0.0001) and DRV/r showed a trend to superiority(by 5.6%(0.3%, 11.0%); p=0.04) compared to LPV/r and ATV/r arms combined. ATV/r was non-inferior to LPV/r(+3.4%(-3.4%,+10.2%); p=0.33). CD4 counts increased with no differences between arms. Toxicity was lowest with DTG. All arms except LPV/r showed age-appropriate weight/height gains at week-96. DTG was not associated with excess absolute weight-gain(<1kg) vs. DRV/r or ATZ/r, irrespective of backbone randomisation. ConclusionsDTG-based regimens are safe and cost-effective for second-line ART. DRV/r and ATV/r are also good options. Fixed-dose combinations of DTG, DRV/r or ATV/r with nucleoside/nucleotide-reverse-transcriptase-inhibitors(NRTIs) would increase access to robust, essential second-line options for children.(ISRCTN22964075)

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.