Back

Second-line tenofovir alafenamide for children with HIV in Africa

Musiime, V.; Szubert, A. J.; Mujuru, H.; Kityo, C.; Doerholt, K.; Makumbi, S.; Mulenga, V.; Ndebele, W.; Mwamabazi, M.; McIlleron, H.; Bwakura-Dangarembizi, M.; Natukunda, E.; Jovia, L. K.; Monkiewicz, L.; Kapasa, M.; Nyathi, M.; Nduna, B.; South, A.; Musoro, G.; Zyambo, K.; Zhang, Y.; Walker, S.; Turkova, A.; Walker, A. S.; Bamford, A.; Gibb, D. M.; CHAPAS-4 Trial Team,

2024-04-21 hiv aids
10.1101/2024.04.12.24304337 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildren living with HIV have few second-line antiretroviral therapy(ART) options, especially fixed-dose-combinations(FDC). MethodsChildren from Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe were randomised to second-line tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)/emtricitabine(FTC) or standard-of-care(SOC) backbone (abacavir(ABC) or zidovudine(ZDV) with lamivudine(3TC)) in the factorial CHAPAS-4 trial. The second randomisation (reported elsewhere) was to dolutegravir(DTG), ritonavir-boosted darunavir(DRV/r), atazanavir(ATV/r) or lopinavir(LPV/r) as anchor drug. All drugs were dosed using WHO weight-bands and children <25kg received a new paediatric TAF/FTC(15/120mg) FDC tablet. The primary endpoint was viral load(VL)<400copies/ml at week-96, analysed using logistic regression, hypothesising that TAF/FTC would be non-inferior to SOC (10% margin). Secondary endpoints included safety and immunological outcomes. Analyses were intention-to-treat. Results919 children 3-15years, 497(54%) male, median[IQR] baseline viral load(VL) 17,573copies/ml [5549-55,700] and CD4 count 669cells/mm3[413-971], spent 99% of time on allocated NRTI backbone. At week-96, 406/454(89.4%) receiving TAF/FTC vs. 378/454(83.3%) receiving SOC had VL<400copies/mL (adjusted difference[95%CI]: 6.3%[2.0%,10.6%], p=0.004), with no evidence that this varied by ABC/3TC or ZDV/3TC SOC. CD4 count improved similarly in both arms. Growth was better with TAF/FTC vs. SOC, without evidence of excess weight-gain with any backbone/anchor drug combination (including DTG{+/-}TAF/FTC, interaction p=0.51). Bone health parameters were similar between arms, irrespective of anchor drug. One child died (treatment-unrelated); 29(3%) had serious adverse events without differences between arms. ConclusionsTAF/FTC was virologically superior to SOC ZDV/3TC or ABC/3TC with a favourable safety profile, irrespective of anchor drug. Development of child-friendly TAF/FTC FDCs ({+/-}anchor drug) would increase cost-effective ART options for children and reduce drug access gaps between children and adults.(ISRCTN22964075)

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.