Back

Second-line tenofovir alafenamide for children with HIV in Africa

Musiime, V.; Szubert, A. J.; Mujuru, H.; Kityo, C.; Doerholt, K.; Makumbi, S.; Mulenga, V.; Ndebele, W.; Mwamabazi, M.; McIlleron, H.; Bwakura-Dangarembizi, M.; Natukunda, E.; Jovia, L. K.; Monkiewicz, L.; Kapasa, M.; Nyathi, M.; Nduna, B.; South, A.; Musoro, G.; Zyambo, K.; Zhang, Y.; Walker, S.; Turkova, A.; Walker, A. S.; Bamford, A.; Gibb, D. M.; CHAPAS-4 Trial Team,

2024-04-21 hiv aids
10.1101/2024.04.12.24304337 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildren living with HIV have few second-line antiretroviral therapy(ART) options, especially fixed-dose-combinations(FDC). MethodsChildren from Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe were randomised to second-line tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)/emtricitabine(FTC) or standard-of-care(SOC) backbone (abacavir(ABC) or zidovudine(ZDV) with lamivudine(3TC)) in the factorial CHAPAS-4 trial. The second randomisation (reported elsewhere) was to dolutegravir(DTG), ritonavir-boosted darunavir(DRV/r), atazanavir(ATV/r) or lopinavir(LPV/r) as anchor drug. All drugs were dosed using WHO weight-bands and children <25kg received a new paediatric TAF/FTC(15/120mg) FDC tablet. The primary endpoint was viral load(VL)<400copies/ml at week-96, analysed using logistic regression, hypothesising that TAF/FTC would be non-inferior to SOC (10% margin). Secondary endpoints included safety and immunological outcomes. Analyses were intention-to-treat. Results919 children 3-15years, 497(54%) male, median[IQR] baseline viral load(VL) 17,573copies/ml [5549-55,700] and CD4 count 669cells/mm3[413-971], spent 99% of time on allocated NRTI backbone. At week-96, 406/454(89.4%) receiving TAF/FTC vs. 378/454(83.3%) receiving SOC had VL<400copies/mL (adjusted difference[95%CI]: 6.3%[2.0%,10.6%], p=0.004), with no evidence that this varied by ABC/3TC or ZDV/3TC SOC. CD4 count improved similarly in both arms. Growth was better with TAF/FTC vs. SOC, without evidence of excess weight-gain with any backbone/anchor drug combination (including DTG{+/-}TAF/FTC, interaction p=0.51). Bone health parameters were similar between arms, irrespective of anchor drug. One child died (treatment-unrelated); 29(3%) had serious adverse events without differences between arms. ConclusionsTAF/FTC was virologically superior to SOC ZDV/3TC or ABC/3TC with a favourable safety profile, irrespective of anchor drug. Development of child-friendly TAF/FTC FDCs ({+/-}anchor drug) would increase cost-effective ART options for children and reduce drug access gaps between children and adults.(ISRCTN22964075)

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
5
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
12
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
17
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%