Two species of the Entolomaquadratum-murrayi complex from Japan, E. kermesinum sp. nov. and E. flavescens sp. nov.
Sato, H.; Satomi, O.; Sugiyama, Y.
Show abstract
We describe two new species, Entoloma. kermesinum sp. nov. and E. flavescens sp. nov., which are confused with E. quadratum and E. murrayi, respectively. We sequenced the large subunit of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA, the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region and 22 single-copy genes for 51 specimens of E. kermesinum, E. flavescens, E. album, and related species. Species boundaries were assessed using the molecular phylogenetics and population genetics approaches. Specimens of E. kermesinum, E. flavescens, and E. album formed independent clades, which were phylogenetically distinct from the specimens of E. quadratum and E. murrayi collected around the type locality (i.e., New England). Although the phylogenetic distance between E. flavescens and E. album was small, gene flow between them was restricted in areas where they coexisted, suggesting reproductive isolation. Therefore, these five species can be treated as independent species. We found characteristics useful for identifying E. kermesinum and E. flavescens. In particular, E. kermesinum is characterized by a crimson to brown-red and fibrillose pileus, finely covered by whitish fibrous scales; E. flavescens is characterized by a lemon-yellow to tan and shiny-to-silky pileus. In addition, relatively large basidiospores and clamp connections are diagnostic features of these two species.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of Metarhizium majus (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) isolated from the Western Cape province, South Africa 95%
- Molecular evidence for the hybrid origin of Cryptocoryne xpurpurea Ridl. nothovar. purpurea (Araceae) 95%
- Morphometric and Molecular Discrimination of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, (Zehntner, 1897) and the sorghum aphid Melanaphis sorghi (Theobald, 1904) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevation of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. californiensis to species level as Clavibacter californiensis sp. nov., merging and re-classification of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. chilensis and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. phaseoli as Clavibacter chilensis sp. nov. based on complete genome in-silico analyses 93%
- Phylogenomic analysis of the Neocallimastigomycota: Proposal of Caecomycetaceae fam. nov., Piromycetaceae fam. nov., and emended description of the families Neocallimastigaceae and Anaeromycetaceae 92%
- Taxonomy of Rhizobiaceae revisited: proposal of a new framework for genus delimitation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution 93%
- Tracing the invasion of a leaf-mining moth in the Palearctic through DNA barcoding of historical herbaria 93%
- Fungal succession on the decomposition of three plant species from a Brazilian mangrove 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Taxonomic revision of the threatened African genus Pseudohydrosme Engl. (Araceae), with P. ebo, a new, Critically Endangered species from Ebo, Cameroon. 94%
- Deinbollia onanae (Sapindaceae), a new, Endangered, montane tree species from the Cameroon Highlands. 94%
- Nepenthes maximoides (Nepenthaceae) a new, Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct) species in Sect. Alatae from Luzon, Philippines showing striking pitcher convergence with N. maxima (Sect. Regiae) of Indonesia. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An expanded phylogeny of Setaria (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae) and its relationships within the subtribe Cenchrinae 95%
- Unravelling the phylogenomic relationships of the most diverse African palm genus Raphia (Calamoideae, Arecaceae) 94%
- Phylogenetic reconstruction and divergence time estimation of Blumea DC. (Asteraceae: Inuleae) in China based on nrDNA ITS and cpDNA trnL-F sequences 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.