Back

Seed sequences mediate off-target activity in the CRISPR-interference (CRISPRi) system

Rohatgi, N.; Fortin, J.-P.; Lau, T.; Ying, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Costa, M.; Reja, R.

2024-04-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.04.10.588881 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) system is a powerful tool that is widely used to selectively and efficiently silence genes in functional genomics research applications. However, the extent of off-target activity associated with the CRISPRi system has not been systematically investigated. Here, we utilized a genome-wide CRISPRi Cas9 single guide RNA (sgRNA) library to investigate the presence of off-target activity and its effects on gene expression. Our findings suggest that off-target effects in CRISPRi are quite pervasive and have direct and indirect impact on gene expression. Most of the identified off-target activities can be accounted for by complementarity of the PAM-proximal genomic sequence with the 3 half of the sgRNA spacer sequence, the seed sequence. We also report that not all PAM proximal positions are equally important for binding of sgRNA to the DNA and that mismatches in the PAM-proximal regions can be tolerated depending on the sequence context.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The CRISPR Journal
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.5%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
8
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
9
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.1%
11
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.7%
13
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
14
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
17
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
RNA
● 189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
RNA Biology
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.