Back

Four centuries of commercial whaling eroded 11,000 years of population stability in bowhead whales

Westbury, M. V.; Brown, S. C.; Cabrera, A. A.; Morales, H. E.; Ma, J.; Rey-Iglesia, A.; Dyke, A. S.; Scharff-Olsen, C. H.; Scott, M.; Wiig, O.; Bachmann, L.; Kovacs, K. M.; Lydersen, C.; Ferguson, S.; Racimo, F.; Szpak, P.; Fordham, D. A.; Lorenzen, E.

2024-04-13 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.04.10.588858 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The bowhead whale, an Arctic endemic, was heavily overexploited during commercial whaling between the 16th-20th centuries1. Current climate warming, with Arctic amplification of average global temperatures, poses a new threat to the species2. Assessing the vulnerability of bowhead whales to near-future predictions of climate change remains challenging, due to lacking data on population dynamics prior to commercial whaling and responses to past climatic change. Here, we integrate palaeogenomics and stable isotope ({delta}13C and{delta} 15N) analysis of 201 bowhead whale fossils from the Atlantic Arctic with palaeoclimate and ecological modelling based on 823 radiocarbon dated fossils, 151 of which are new to this study. We find long-term resilience of bowhead whales to Holocene environmental perturbations, with no obvious changes in genetic diversity or population structure, despite large environmental shifts and centuries of whaling by Indigenous peoples prior to commercial harvests. Leveraging our empirical data, we simulated a time-series model to quantify population losses associated with commercial whaling. Our results indicate that commercial exploitation induced population subdivision and losses of genetic diversity that are yet to be fully realised; declines in genetic diversity will continue, even without future population size reductions, compromising the species resilience to near-future predictions of Arctic warming.

Published in Cell (predicted rank #16) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.