Back

A Structural Proteome Screen Identifies Protein Mimicry in Host-Microbe Systems

Penunuri, G. A.; Wang, P.; Corbett-Detig, R.; Russell, S.

2024-04-13 bioinformatics Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.04.10.588793 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Host-microbe systems are evolutionary niches that produce coevolved biological interactions and are a key component of global health. However, these systems have historically been a difficult field of biological research due to their experimental intractability. Impactful advances in global health will be obtained by leveraging in silico screens to identify genes involved in mediating interspecific interactions. These predictions will progress our understanding of these systems and lay the groundwork for future in vitro and in vivo experiments and bioengineering projects. A driver of host-manipulation and intracellular survival utilized by host-associated microbes is molecular mimicry, a critical mechanism that can occur at any level from DNA to protein structures. We applied protein structure prediction and alignment tools to explore host-associated bacterial structural proteomes for examples of protein structure mimicry. By leveraging the Legionella pneumophila proteome and its many known structural mimics, we developed and validated a screen that can be applied to virtually any host-microbe system to uncover signals of protein mimicry. These mimics represent candidate proteins that mediate host interactions in microbial proteomes. We successfully applied this screen to other microbes with demonstrated effects on global health, Helicobacter pylori and Wolbachia, identifying protein mimic candidates in each proteome. We discuss the roles these candidates may play in important Wolbachia-induced phenotypes and show that Wobachia infection can partially rescue the loss of one of these factors. This work demonstrates how a genome-wide screen for candidates of host-manipulation and intracellular survival offers an opportunity to identify functionally important genes in host-microbe systems.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.9%
2
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.1%
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.8%
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
6
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.2%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
10
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
14
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
21
Journal of Bacteriology
190 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
23
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
27
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
28
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%