Consensus Guideline for the Management of Patients with Peritoneal Mesothelioma
PSM Writing Group, ; PSM Consortium Group, ; Turaga, K. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundTreatment of peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM) poses significant challenges owing to its rare incidence, heterogeneity and limited clinical evidence. This manuscript describes results from a national consensus aimed at addressing management of PeM. MethodsAn update of the 2018 Chicago Consensus Guidelines was conducted using a Modified Delphi technique, encompassing two rounds of voting. The levels of agreement for various pathway blocks were assessed. ResultsOf 101 participants responding in the first round of Modified Delphi voting, 95 (94%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in 5/6 and 6/6 pathway blocks in rounds I and II, respectively. Observation was recommended for benign neoplasms, with guidance for interventions in the presence of symptoms or concerning clinicopathologic features. For malignant pathology, management was outlined based on a multidisciplinary assessment of patient characteristics, disease histology, and predictive success of medical and surgical interventions. Additional emphasis was placed on multimodal therapy for Intermediate-Risk and appropriate High-Risk patients. A rapid review demonstrated limited availability of data and inconclusive findings regarding optimal systemic therapy timing. There was unanimous support for considering clinical trial enrollment. ConclusionsGiven limited evidence, the consensus-driven pathway provides essential guidance regarding the management of PeM. To further direct clinical care, additional dedicated research to generate higher-quality evidence is needed.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of PD-(L)1 blockade monotherapy compared to PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy in first-line PD-L1-positive advanced lung adenocarcinomas: A cohort study 90%
- A Spatial Comparison of Molecular Features Associated with Resistance to Pembrolizumab in BCG Unresponsive Bladder Cancer 90%
- Reversible Downregulation of HLA Class I in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 93%
- Clinical activity of MAPK targeted therapies in patients with non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors 91%
- Normalized LST is an efficient biomarker for homologous recombination deficiency and Olaparib response in ovarian carcinoma 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient attrition in Molecular Tumour Boards: A Review 92%
- Ovarian carcinosarcoma is a distinct form of ovarian cancer with poorer survival compared to tubo-ovarian high grade serous carcinoma 92%
- Spatial, Temporal, and Molecular Heterogeneity of ADC targets in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating tumor fraction analyses with ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing predict response to chemoradiation and recurrence in stage IV small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a longitudinal case study 92%
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of coaxial core-needle biopsy (CNB) system in Oncology patients treated in a specialist cancer centre with prospective validation within clinical trial data 91%
- Phenotyping of lymphoproliferative tumours generated in xenografts of non-small cell lung cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 93%
- Reproducibility and transparency characteristics of oncology research evidence 89%
- Head-to-head comparison of the RMI and ADNEX models to estimate the risk of ovarian malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.