Spatially Enhanced Processing for Valuable Objects in Prefrontal Cortex Neurons During Efficient Search
Sharifi, K.; Abbaszadeh, M.; Ghazizadeh, A.
Show abstract
It is recently shown that objects with long-term reward associations can be efficiently located during visual search. The neural mechanism for valuable object pop-out is unknown. In this work, we recorded neuronal responses in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) with known roles in visual search and reward processing in macaques while monkeys engaged in efficient vs inefficient visual search for high-value fractal objects (targets). Behavioral results and modeling using multi-alternative attention-modulated drift-diffusion (MADD) indicated that efficient search was concurrent with enhanced processing for peripheral objects. Notably, neural results showed response amplification and receptive field widening to peripherally presented targets in vlPFC during visual search. Both neural effects predict higher target detection and were found to be correlated with it. Our results suggest that value-driven efficient search independent of low-level visual features arises from reward-induced spatial processing enhancement of peripheral valuable objects.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A circuit mechanism for irrationalities in decision-making and NMDA receptor hypofunction: behaviour, computational modelling, and pharmacology 97%
- Neural Geometry from Mixed Sensorimotor Selectivity for Predictive Sensorimotor Control 96%
- Synaptic and intrinsic mechanisms underlying development of cortical direction selectivity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Amodal population clock in the primate medial premotor system for rhythmic tapping 96%
- In V4, pair-wise synchony and correlations depend on the structure of the population code 95%
- Trial-by-trial variability in cortical responses exhibits scaling in spatial correlations predicted from critical dynamics 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.