Does Ethnicity Alters the Risk of Stroke in Patients with Modifiable Cardiometabolic Risk Factors?
Delord, M.; Ashworth, M.; Douiri, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundEthnic inequality in stroke risk was partially explained by a history of hypertension, diabetes and socioeconomic status. We aimed to estimate the impact of ethnicity on the hazard of stroke in patients with hypertension, diabetes or hypercholesterolaemia in an urban, multiethnic, youthful and deprived population. MethodsMultistate models were constructed using electronic health records, including the date of stroke onset, stroke risk factors, and the Index of Multiple Deprivation in Asian, Black or White adult patients registered at 41 general practices in South London between 2005 and 2021. Transitions to hypertension, diabetes or hypercholesterolaemia (transition 1), and from these cardiometabolic risk factors to stroke (transition 2) were considered. ResultsThe study included 651,888 of the 849,968 registered patients (76.7%), of whom 8.6% were Asian, 18.2% Black, and 73.2% White, while 54.1% were female. Stroke incidence was 2.1% in Black patients, 1.2% in Asian patients, and 1.0% in White patients. Compared to White patients, Asian and Black patients had generally a higher risk of transitioning to hypertension, diabetes or hypercholesterolaemia (transition 1). Ethnicity however, did not affect transition to stroke from cardiometabolic risk factors (transition 2), except for hypercholesterolaemia, where Black patients had a higher risk of strokes. ConclusionOur results confirm that Black ethnicity does not confer excess hazard of stroke in patients with hypertension or diabetes. This observation was also made for Asian ethnicity. An excess hazard of stroke associated with Black ethnicity was observed only in patients with hypercholesterolaemia.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Undiagnosed hypertension and its associated factors in India: A rural-urban contrast from the National Family Health Survey (2019-21) 94%
- Prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors according to urbanization level, gender and age, in apparently healthy adults living in Gabon, Central Africa 94%
- Genetic Variant rs1205 is Associated with COVID-19 Outcomes: The Strong Heart Study and Strong Heart Family Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in rural South Africa: A cross-sectional analysis of the HAALSI cohort 94%
- Carotid Intima-media thickness, carotid distensibility and incident heart failure in older men: The British Regional Heart Study 93%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Obesity, hypertension and tobacco use associated with left ventricular remodelling and hypertrophy in South African Women: Birth to Twenty Plus Cohort 94%
- Long-term risk of Stroke after Acute Coronary Syndrome. The ABC-10* Study on Heart Disease. 94%
- Postoperative glycemic variability as a predictor for one-year mortality following coronary artery bypass grafting: A retrospective cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort profile: The LipidCardio Study - Role of Lipoproteins in Cardiovascular Disease 94%
- Outcome Disparities by Insurance Plan and Educational Attainment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation 93%
- Prevalence Of Abdominal Obesity And Its Association With Cardiovascular Risk Among The Adult Population In Burkina Faso 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family history and polygenic risk of cardiovascular disease: independent factors associated with secondary cardiovascular manifestations in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy 93%
- The association between lymphocyte mitochondrial DNA abundance and Stroke: a combination of multivariable-adjusted survival and mendelian randomization analyses 93%
- LDLR Variant Classification for Improved Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Familial Hypercholesterolemia 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.