Back

Does Ethnicity Alters the Risk of Stroke in Patients with Modifiable Cardiometabolic Risk Factors?

Delord, M.; Ashworth, M.; Douiri, A.

2024-04-09 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.04.08.24305017 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEthnic inequality in stroke risk was partially explained by a history of hypertension, diabetes and socioeconomic status. We aimed to estimate the impact of ethnicity on the hazard of stroke in patients with hypertension, diabetes or hypercholesterolaemia in an urban, multiethnic, youthful and deprived population. MethodsMultistate models were constructed using electronic health records, including the date of stroke onset, stroke risk factors, and the Index of Multiple Deprivation in Asian, Black or White adult patients registered at 41 general practices in South London between 2005 and 2021. Transitions to hypertension, diabetes or hypercholesterolaemia (transition 1), and from these cardiometabolic risk factors to stroke (transition 2) were considered. ResultsThe study included 651,888 of the 849,968 registered patients (76.7%), of whom 8.6% were Asian, 18.2% Black, and 73.2% White, while 54.1% were female. Stroke incidence was 2.1% in Black patients, 1.2% in Asian patients, and 1.0% in White patients. Compared to White patients, Asian and Black patients had generally a higher risk of transitioning to hypertension, diabetes or hypercholesterolaemia (transition 1). Ethnicity however, did not affect transition to stroke from cardiometabolic risk factors (transition 2), except for hypercholesterolaemia, where Black patients had a higher risk of strokes. ConclusionOur results confirm that Black ethnicity does not confer excess hazard of stroke in patients with hypertension or diabetes. This observation was also made for Asian ethnicity. An excess hazard of stroke associated with Black ethnicity was observed only in patients with hypercholesterolaemia.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.