Back

Exploring the digital landscape: A Comprenhensive Analysis of Infertility Narratives on Instagram

Gillellamudi, A.; vellanki, S.; kumar, B.

2024-04-09 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2024.04.07.24305110 medRxiv
Show abstract

In the digital age, the prevalence of infertility and the trend of delaying childbearing have significantly influenced fertility choices. Social media, particularly Instagram, has emerged as a vital part of daily life for many, with a notable percentage of American adults engaging daily. Recognizing the impact of online platforms, this cross-sectional observational study, conducted in May 2023, delved into the nature and quality of 673 Instagram posts related to infertility. It aimed to analyze the information and support available to individuals navigating infertility, particularly focusing on the posts DISCERN and Global Quality Scores (GQS) to assess their reliability and quality. The findings reveal that many women derive substantial benefits from their online experiences. Instagram serves as a source of coping mechanisms for the challenges associated with infertility diagnosis and treatment. The platform allows for the sharing of personal feelings and experiences, providing a valued sense of community and support. However, it also presents a risk of spreading misinformation, underscoring the need for careful consideration of content quality. The study emphasizes the importance of accessible and reliable online resources. It suggests that healthcare professionals should play a more active role in guiding patients to trustworthy information. In conclusion, while social media offers valuable support and unique insights for individuals dealing with infertility, the quality and reliability of the information remain critical concerns. The study advocates for a more informed and conscientious use of these platforms, highlighting the potential for both support and misinformation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.