Back

Deep Brain Stimulation of Nucleus Basalis of Meynert improves learning in rat model of dementia.

Kumbhare, D.; Rajagopal, M.; Toms, J.; Freelin, A.; Weistroffer, G.; McComb, N.; Karnam, S.; Azghadi, A.; Murnane, K.; Baron, M.; Holloway, K.

2024-04-09 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.04.05.588271 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) has been preliminarily investigated as a potential treatment for dementia. The degeneration of NBM cholinergic neurons is a pathological feature of many forms of dementia. Although stimulation of the NBM has been demonstrated to improve learning, the ideal parameters for NBM stimulation have not been elucidated. This study assesses the differential effects of varying stimulation patterns and duration on learning in a dementia rat model. Methods192-IgG-saporin (or vehicle) was injected into the NBM to produce dementia in rats. Next, all rats underwent unilateral implantation of a DBS electrode in the NBM. The experimental groups consisted of i-normal, ii-untreated demented, and iii-demented rats receiving NBM DBS. The stimulation paradigms included testing different modes (tonic and burst) and durations (1-hr, 5-hrs, and 24-hrs/day) over 10 daily sessions. Memory was assessed pre- and post-stimulation using two established learning paradigms: novel object recognition (NOR) and auditory operant chamber learning. ResultsBoth normal and stimulated rats demonstrated improved performance in NOR and auditory learning as compared to the unstimulated demented group. The burst stimulation groups performed better than the tonic stimulated group. Increasing the daily stimulation duration to 24-hr did not further improve cognitive performance in an auditory recognition task and degraded the results on a NOR task as compared with 5-hr. ConclusionThe present findings suggest that naturalistic NBM burst DBS may offer a potential effective therapy for treating dementia and suggests potential strategies for the reevaluation of current human NBM stimulation paradigms.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.8%
2
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
8
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
12
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
European Journal of Pharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
25
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%
27
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
28
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%