Effective population size of X chromosomes and haplodiploids under cyclical parthenogenesis
Hitchcock, T.
Show abstract
Many organisms can reproduce both sexually and asexually. Many such groups also exhibit ploidy differences between males and females during the sexual phase of their life, including aphids, nematodes, wasps, and rotifers. The constraints of combining asexual reproduction with asymmetric ploidy often results in X chromosomes (or haplodiploids) which show distinct transmission genetics from conventional systems. This may be expected to impact the effective population size; however, we currently lack analytical expressions for such life cycles. To remedy this, here we generate expressions for the effective population size of X chromosomes and haplodiploids under cyclical parthenogenesis. By first analysing a purely sexual scenario, we show how these distinct transmission genetics generate an effective population size substantially smaller than that of the autosomes, and how it may be further altered by aspects of sex-specific ecology, inbreeding, and non-random X elimination. Considering this inheritance system in an explicit population structure also demonstrates how genetic differentiation builds up differently between autosomes and X chromosomes. By introducing asexual reproduction into the model, we can see how low frequencies of sex cause these differences between autosomes and X chromosomes to dissipate. We discuss the relevance of these results to some different groups and consider future avenues for both empirical and theoretical work.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Which cues are sexy? The evolution of mate preference in sympatric species reveals the contrasted effect of adaptation and reproductive interference. 96%
- How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations ? 96%
- Hybridization enables the fixation of selfish queen genotypes in eusocial colonies 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.