Compromised actin dynamics underlie the orofacial cleft in Baraitser-Winter Cerebrofrontofacial Syndrome with a variant in ACTB
Tsujimoto, T.; Ou, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Murata, Y.; Inubushi, T.; Nagata, M.; Ishihara, Y.; Yonei, A.; Miyashita, Y.; Asano, Y.; Sakai, N.; Ogino, H.; Sakata, Y.; Yamashiro, T.; Kurosaka, H.
Show abstract
Craniofacial anomalies encompassing the orofacial cleft are associated with >30% of systemic congenital malformations. Baraitser-Winter Cerebrofrontofacial syndrome (BWCFF) is a rare genetic disorder attributed to variants in the actin beta (ACTB) or actin gamma genes that are correlated with a range of craniofacial abnormalities, including cleft lip and/or palate. The underlying pathological mechanism of BWCFF remains elusive, and it is necessary to investigate the etiology of orofacial clefts in BWCFF. In this study, we identified a missense variant (c.1043C>T: p.S348L) in the ACTB gene from a patient with BWCFF and concomitant cleft lip and palate. Furthermore, we performed functional assessments of this variant using various disease models such as the MDCK cell line and Xenopus laevis. These models revealed a compromised capacity of mutated ACTB to localize at the epithelial junction, consequently affecting the behavior of epithelial cells. Additionally, we made the noteworthy discovery that mutated ACTB exhibited an impaired ability to bind PROFILIN1, a critical factor in actin polymerization. This defective ability may contribute to the molecular etiology of aberrant epithelial cell adhesion and migration, resulting in orofacial cleft formation in BWCFF. Author SummaryAdvances in clinical sequencing have rapidly elucidated the genetic basis of rare diseases affecting multiple organs. In this study, we investigate the role of a variant in the ACTB gene, which is fundamental to cell structure, in causing orofacial clefts in the Baraitser-Winter Cerebrofrontofacial Syndrome (BWCFF), known for its distinctive facial anomalies. Using epithelial cell lines and frog embryo models, we investigated the effects of the ACTB gene alteration on cellular functions. Our results indicate that this genetic change disrupts the normal adhesion and movement of epithelial cells, processes that are critical for facial development. This research underscores the importance of the ACTB gene in shaping the face and suggests new directions for future research, potentially informing the diagnosis and treatment of BWCFF and related conditions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic interactions among ADAMTS metalloproteases and basement membrane molecules in cell migration in Caenorhabditis elegans 95%
- Teratogenic Drug Topiramate Upregulates TGFβ1 and SOX9 Expression in Primary Palatal Mesenchyme Cells 94%
- Linking Expression and Function of Drosophila Type-I TGF-b Receptor Baboon Isoforms: Multiple Roles of BaboA Isoform in Shaping of the Adult Central Nervous System 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- THOC1 deficiency leads to late-onset nonsyndromic hearing loss through p53-mediated hair cell apoptosis 94%
- Systematic mapping of rRNA 2'-O methylation during frog development and involvement of the methyltransferase Fibrillarin in eye and craniofacial development in Xenopus laevis 93%
- The nanophthalmos protein TMEM98 inhibits MYRF self-cleavage and is required for eye size specification 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Toward the pathogenicity of the SLC26A4 p.C565Y variant using a genetically driven mouse model 93%
- A male infertility mutation reverts NANOS1 activity from anti-apoptotic to pro-apoptotic by disrupting repression of GADD45A, GADD45B, GADD45G and RHOB genes 92%
- RTL4, a retrovirus-derived gene implicated in autism spectrum disorder, is a microglial gene that responds to noradrenaline in the postnatal brain 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.