MPRAVarDB: an online database and web server for exploring regulatory effects of genetic variants
Javlon, N.; Jin, W.; Xia, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, L.
Show abstract
SummaryMassively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) is an important technology to evaluate the impact of genetic variants on gene regulation. Here, we present MPRAVarDB, an online database and web server, for exploring regulatory effects of genetic variants. MPRAVarDB harbors 18 MPRA experiments designed to assess the regulatory effects of genetic variants associated with GWAS loci, eQTLs and various genomic features, resulting in a total of 242,818 variants tested across more than 30 cell lines and 30 human diseases or traits. MPRAVarDB empowers the query of MPRA variants by genomic region, disease and cell line or by any combination of these query terms. Notably, MPRAVarDB offers a suite of pretrained machine learning models tailored to the specific disease and cell line, facilitating the genome-wide prediction of regulatory variants. MPRAVarDB is friendly to use, and users only need a few clicks to receive query and prediction results. Availabilityhttps://mpravardb.rc.ufl.edu Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- FAVOR: Functional Annotation of Variants Online Resource and Annotator for Variation across the Human Genome 95%
- Whole genome base-wise aggregation and functional prediction for human non-coding regulatory variants 95%
- ConVarT: a search engine for matching human genetic variants with variants from non-human species 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- FILER: large-scale, harmonized FunctIonaL gEnomics Repository 95%
- SyMetrics: An Integrated Machine Learning Model for Evaluating the Pathogenicity of Synonymous Variants in the Human Genome 95%
- DoBSeqWF: A framework for sensitive detection of individual genetic variation in pooled sequencing data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.