Back

BEAN and HABAS: Polyphyletic insertions in RNAP that point to deep evolutionary divergence of bacteria

Alvarez-Carreno, C.; Huynh, A. T.; Orengo, C.; Williams, L. D.

2024-04-02 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.04.02.587612 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The {beta} and {beta} subunits of the RNA polymerase (RNAP) are large proteins with complex multi-domain architectures that include several insertional domains. Here, we analyze the multi-domain organizations of bacterial RNAP-{beta} and RNAP-{beta} using sequence, experimentally determined structures and AlphaFold structure predictions. We observe that bacterial lineage-specific domains in RNAP-{beta} belong to a group of domains that we call BEAN (Broadly Embedded ANnex) and that in RNAP-{beta}, bacterial lineage-specific domains are HAmmerhead/BArrel-Sandwich Hybrid (HABAS) domains. The BEAN domain has a characteristic three-dimensional structure composed of two square bracket-like elements that are antiparallel relative to each other. The HABAS domain contains a four-stranded open {beta}-sheet with a GD-box-like motif in one of the {beta}-strands and the adjoining loop. The BEAN domain is identified not only in the bacterial RNAP-{beta}, but also in the archaeal version of universal ribosomal protein L10. The HABAS domain is observed as an insertional domain in several metabolic proteins. The phylogenetic distributions of bacterial lineage-specific insertional domains of {beta} and {beta} subunits of RNAP follow the Tree of Life. The presence of insertional domains can help establish a relative timeline of events in the evolution of a protein because insertion is inferred to post-date the base domain. We discuss mechanisms that might account for the discovery of homologous insertional domains in non-equivalent locations in bacteria and archaea.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.