Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Improve Cognition in Cancer: A Protocol For An Overview Of Systematic Reviews
Haywood, D.; Henneghan, A. M.; Dauer, E.; Vasan, S.; Franco-Rocha, O.; Wilding, H.; Hart, N. H.
Show abstract
Many cancer survivors, including those with a current or previous diagnosis of cancer, experience cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCI). CRCI can impact their ability to think quickly, clearly, make decisions and perform daily actions. There have been a variety of non-pharmacological interventions developed and trialed with the aim of reducing CRCI or mitigating its impact. The aim of this work is to provide an overall picture of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition in cancer survivors by providing an overview and synthesis of systematic reviews. Review TitleEffectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Improve Cognition in Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 91%
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 93%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 92%
- The Role of Prehabilitation in Improving Brain Health and Cognition After Chemotherapy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Study Protocol of the Chemo Brain Prehab Project 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the global data involving 61,532 cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection 90%
- Missing data in the medical record for oncology patients: prevalence and association with outcomes 89%
- Obesity paradox in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 6,320,365 patients 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Landscape of Clinical Trials in Cancer Cachexia: Assessment of Trends From 1995-2024 91%
- Temozolomide sensitivity of malignant glioma cell lines – a systematic review assessing consistencies between in vitro studies 90%
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of lag time to cancer diagnosis and treatment on clinical outcomes prior to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses 92%
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 89%
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Screening and Treatment in Older Adults: The Multiethnic Cohort Study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.