Back

SPLICER: A Highly Efficient Base Editing Toolbox That Enables In Vivo Therapeutic Exon Skipping

Miskalis, A.; Shirguppe, S.; Winter, J.; Elias, G.; Swami, D.; Nambiar, A.; Stilger, M.; Woods, W.; Gosstola, N.; Gapinske, M.; Zeballos, A.; Moore, H.; Maslov, S.; Gaj, T.; Perez-Pinera, P.

2024-04-02 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.04.01.587650 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Exon skipping technologies enable exclusion of targeted exons from mature mRNA transcripts, which has broad applications in molecular biology, medicine, and biotechnology. Existing exon skipping techniques include antisense oligonucleotides, targetable nucleases, and base editors, which, while effective for specific applications at some target exons, remain hindered by shortcomings, including transient effects for oligonucleotides, genotoxicity for nucleases and inconsistent exon skipping for base editors. To overcome these limitations, we created SPLICER, a toolbox of next-generation base editors consisting of near-PAMless Cas9 nickase variants fused to adenosine or cytosine deaminases for the simultaneous editing of splice acceptor (SA) and splice donor (SD) sequences. Synchronized SA and SD editing with SPLICER improves exon skipping, reduces aberrant outcomes, including cryptic splicing and intron retention, and enables skipping of exons refractory to single splice-site editing. To demonstrate the therapeutic potential of SPLICER, we targeted APP exon 17, which encodes the amino acid residues that are cleaved to form the A{beta} plaques in Alzheimers disease. SPLICER reduced the formation of A{beta}42 peptides in vitro and enabled efficient exon skipping in a mouse model of Alzheimers disease. Overall, SPLICER is a widely applicable and efficient toolbox for exon skipping with broad therapeutic applications.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.