Back

Anatomy of the mandibular symphysis of extant cercopithecids: taxonomy and variation

Pallas, L.; Nakatsukasa, M.; Kunimatsu, Y.

2024-04-01 zoology
10.1101/2024.03.31.587451 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The symphyseal anatomy of extant and fossil cercopithecids has not yet been demonstrated as a useful tool for taxonomic discrimination, and the source of variation in cercopithecid symphysis has not been addressed on a broad taxonomic scale. Here, we used linear and angular dimensions to quantify symphysis shape. Using univariate, multivariate data and allometric regressions (partial least squares and phylogenetic generalized least square regressions), we addressed the hypothesis that extant cercopithecids can be distinguished by symphysis shape. Significant differences in univariate and multivariate data and allometric regressions permitted to distinguish cercopithecids at the subfamilial, tribal, and genus levels. We showed that multivariate data followed the distribution expected under Brownian Motion and significantly discriminates taxa at different taxonomic levels. Colobine symphysis are characterized by developed inferior transverse tori, short planum alveolare, and short symphysis, whereas cercopithecine symphysis are characterized by developed superior transverse tori, long planum alveolare, and long symphysis. Exceptions to this pattern exist within each subfamily, and this study underlines the particular anatomy of Colobus and Presbytis among the colobines, Allenopithecus among the Cercopithecini, and Theropithecus and Lophocebus among the Papionini. We also demonstrate that the relative development of the transverse tori, the relative length of the planum alveolare and symphyseal inclination are dimorphic traits. Specifically, we show that the symphysis of Procolobus verus, Nasalis larvatus, and Papio anubis is strongly dimorphic.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.0%
4
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
7
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
12
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.0%
15
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
16
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
17
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
18
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
29
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%