fMROI: a simple and adaptable toolbox for easy region-of-interest creation
Peres, A. S. C.; Valerio, D.; Vaz, I. S.; Mahdiani, M.; Walbrin, J.; Almeida, J.
Show abstract
This study introduces fMROI, an open-source software designed for creating regions-of-interest (ROIs) and visualizing magnetic resonance imaging data. fMROI offers a user-friendly graphical interface that simplifies the creation of complex ROIs. It is compatible with various operating systems and enables the integration of user-specified algorithms. Comparative analysis against popular neuroimaging software demonstrates the feasibility, applicability, and ease of use of fMROI. Notably, fMROIs interactive graphical interface with a real-time viewer allows users to identify inconsistencies and design more accurate ROIs, saving significant time by avoiding errors before storing ROIs as NIfTI files. Additionally, fMROI supports automation through command-line accessibility, making it ideal for large-scale analyses. As an open-source platform, fMROI provides a valuable resource for researchers in the neuroimaging community, facilitating efficient ROI creation and streamlining neuroimage analysis.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Isolating the Sources of Pipeline-Variability in Group-Level Task-fMRI results 97%
- ENIGMA HALFpipe: Interactive, reproducible, and efficient analysis for resting-state and task-based fMRI data 97%
- PhiPipe: a multi-modal MRI data processing pipeline with test-retest reliability and predicative validity assessments 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved segmentation of the intracranial and ventricular volumes in populations with cerebrovascular lesions and atrophy using 3D CNNs 96%
- Fast estimation of L1-regularized linear models in the mass univariate setting 96%
- Pitfalls and recommended strategies and metrics for suppressing motion artifacts in functional MRI 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.