CRISPR-MIP replaces PCR and reveals GC and oversampling bias in pooled CRISPR screens
Selinger, M.; Yakovenko, I.; Nazir, I.; Henriksson, J.
Show abstract
Pooled CRISPR screening is a powerful tool for finding the most important genes related to a biological process of interest. The quality of the generated gene list is however influenced by a range of technical parameters, such as CRISPR (single guide) sgRNA target efficiency, and further innovations are still called for. One open problem is the precise estimation of sgRNA abundances, as required for the statistical analysis. We do so using molecular inversion probes (MIPs) combined with the use of unique molecular identifiers (UMIs), thus enabling deduplication and absolute counting of cells. We show that this is a viable approach that eliminates sequencing depth bias. Furthermore, we find that GC% bias affects PCR, calling for a reanalysis of published CRISPR screen data and sgRNA efficiency estimates. We propose our method as a new gold standard for sgRNA quantification, especially for genes that are not top ranked but still of broad interest.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide functional screens enable the prediction of high activity CRISPR-Cas9 and -Cas12a guides in Yarrowia lipolytica 97%
- A generalizable Cas9/sgRNA prediction model using machine transfer learning with small high-quality datasets 96%
- Agreement between two large pan-cancer CRISPR-Cas9 gene dependency datasets 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.