Back

Current forest carbon offset buffer pools do not adequately insure against disturbance-driven carbon losses

Anderegg, W. R. L.; Trugman, A. T.; Vargas G., G.; Wu, C.; Yang, L.

2024-03-31 ecology
10.1101/2024.03.28.587000 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nature-based climate solutions in Earths forests could strengthen the land carbon sink and contribute to climate mitigation, but must adequately account for climate risks to the durability of carbon storage. Forest carbon offset protocols use a buffer pool to insure against disturbance risks that may compromise durability. However, current buffer pool tools and allocations are not based on existing scientific data or models. Here, we use a tropical forest stand biomass model and an extensive set of long-term tropical forest plots to test whether current buffer pools are adequate to insure against observed disturbance regimes. We find that forest age and disturbance regime both influence necessary buffer pool sizes. In the vast majority of disturbance scenarios, current buffer pools are substantially smaller than required by carbon cycle science. Buffer pool estimates urgently need to be updated based on rigorous, open scientific datasets for nature-based climate solutions to succeed. Plain Language SummaryForests could contribute to climate mitigation through conservation and restoration activities. Carbon offsets are a widespread pathway to fund these nature-based climate solutions in forests, but must account for the risks to durability that forests face in a changing climate. Current carbon offset protocols have a buffer pool to insure against risk in different disturbance regimes, but the buffer pool contributions have not been tested with observed disturbance regimes and rigorous models. We tested these contributions using widespread tropical forest plot data and a carbon cycle model and find that the current buffer pool contributions are generally not adequate for most disturbance regimes. Our results highlight that better datasets, models, and tools are urgently needed in forest carbon offset protocols. Key pointsO_LINature-based climate solutions in forests face substantial and rising climate risks to durability C_LIO_LICarbon offsets use a buffer pool to insure against disturbance, which is not currently based on rigorous evidence C_LIO_LIOur results reveal current carbon offset protocols do not have an adequate buffer pool for most tropical forest disturbance regimes C_LI

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
53.0%
50% of probability mass above
2
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
3
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
4
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
7
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
10
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
11
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
13
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
15
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
16
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
18
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%