Biomechanical regulation of cell shapes promotes branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud epithelium
Kurtzeborn, K.; Iaroshenko, V.; Zarybnicky, T.; Koivula, J.; Anttonen, H. S.; Bridgewater, D.; Krishnan, R.; Chen, P.; Kuure, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundBranching morphogenesis orchestrates organogenesis in many tissues including kidney, where ureteric bud branching determines kidney size and nephron number. Defects in branching morphogenesis result in congenital renal anomalies which manifest as deviations in size, function, and nephron number thus critically compromising the lifelong renal functional capacity established during development. Advances in the genetic and molecular understanding of ureteric bud branching regulation have proved insufficient to improve prognosis of congenital renal defects. Thus, we addressed mechanisms regulating three-dimensional (3D) ureteric bud epithelial cell morphology and cell shape changes during novel branch initiation to uncover the contributions of cellular mechanics on cellular functions and tissue organization in normal and branching-compromised bud tips. MethodsWe explored epithelial cell behavior at all scales by utilizing a combination of mouse genetics and a custom machine-learning segmentation pipeline in MATLAB. Ureteric bud epithelial cell shapes and sizes were quantified in 3D wholemount kidneys. A combination with live imaging of fluorescently labelled UB cells, traction force microscopy, and primary UB cells were used to determine how basic cellular features and niche biomechanics contribute to complex novel branch point determination in the process that aims at gaining optimal growth and epithelial density in a limited space. ResultsMachine learning-based segmentation of tip epithelia identified geometrical round-to-elliptical transformation as a key cell shape change facilitating shifts in growth direction that enable propitious branching complexity. Cell shape and molecular analyses in branching-compromised epithelia demonstrated a failure to condense cell size and conformation. Analysis of branching-compromised ureteric bud derived epithelial cells demonstrated disrupted E-CADHERIN and PAXILLIN mediated adhesive forces and defective cytoskeletal dynamics as detected by fluorescent labelling of actin in primary ureteric bud epithelial cells. Branching-compromised ureteric bud epithelial cells showed wrinkled nuclear shapes and alterations in MYH9-based microtubule organization, which suggest a stiff cellular niche with disturbed sensing of and response to biomechanical cues. ConclusionsOur results indicate that the adhesive forces within the epithelium and towards the niche composed of nephron progenitors must dynamically fluctuate to allow complexity in arborization during new branch formation. The data collectively propose a model where epithelial cell crowding in tandem with stretching transforms individual cells into elliptical and elongated shapes. This creates local curvatures that drive new branch formation during the ampulla-to-asymmetric ampulla transition of ureteric bud.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CRB2 Depletion Induces YAP Signaling and Disrupts Mechanosensing in Podocytes 95%
- The transcription factor TCF21 is necessary for adoption of cell fates by Foxd1+ stromal progenitors during kidney development 95%
- Tcf21 as a Founder Transcription Factor in Specifying Foxd1 Cells to the Juxtaglomerular Cell Lineage 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell profiling of mouse acute kidney injury reveals conserved cellular responses to injury 94%
- Redundant and additive functions of the four Lef/Tcf transcription factors in lung epithelial progenitors 93%
- Neighbor-specific gene expression revealed from physically interacting cells during mouse embryonic development 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.