Back

Prediction of Severe Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Using Radiomic Features from Resting Cardiac Ultrasound Images: A Pilot Study

Aziz, D.; Jamthikar, A. D.; Bhattaru, A.; Desingu, K.; Rajiv, N.; Maganti, K.; Hamirani, Y.; Bokhari, S.; Yanamala, N.; Sengupta, P.

2024-03-30 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.03.28.24305048 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlthough cardiac ultrasound is frequently performed in patients with chest pain, the probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) cannot be quantified. We investigated the potential of cardiac ultrasound radiomics (ultrasomics) to identify obstructive CAD using limited echocardiography frames, suitable for cardiac point-of-care ultrasound evaluation. MethodsIn total, 333 patients who were either healthy controls (n=30), undergoing invasive coronary procedures (n=113), or coronary CT angiography (n=190) were divided into two temporally distinct training (n=271) and testing (n=62) cohorts. Machine learning models were developed using ultrasomics for predicting severe CAD (stenosis >70%) and compared with regional LV wall motion abnormalities (RWMA). ResultsIn total, 94 (28.2%) patients had severe CAD with 50 (15.0%) having high-risk CAD defined as left main stenosis >50% (n=11), multivessel CAD (n=43), or 100% occlusion (n=20). The ultrasomics model was superior to RWMA for predicting severe CAD [area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74 to 0.86) vs. 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.72), p=0.0014] in the training set and [0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90) vs. 0.70 (95% CI: 0.56-0.81), p=0.24] in the test set, respectively. The model also predicted high-risk CAD with an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90) in the training set and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.48-0.88) in the test set. A combination of ultrasomics with RWMA showed incremental value over RWMA alone for predicting severe CAD. ConclusionsCardiac ultrasomic features extracted from limited echocardiography views can aid the development of machine learning models to predict the presence of severe obstructive CAD.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.